Evidence of the flood

THE SAGGING PREEMPTS EVERYTHING ELSE.

IN MY SCENARIO THE COCONINO CERTAINLY IS CONTINUOUS WITH THE HERMIT.

DIFFERENT SEDIMENTS BUT SO WHAT, SAME FORM

OH THAT IMAGINARY UNCONFORMITY? HA HA.

YOU BET ITS CLEAR. STRATA ALL LAID DOWN AND THEN IT ALL SAGS DUE TO THE SALT LAYER

THAT UNCONFORMITY EXISTS ONLY IN THE MINDS OF GEOLOGISTS BECAUSE THE TOE REQUIRES IT IN ORDER TO KEEP UP THE ILLUSION OF TIME AND FOSSIL CONTINUITY, THE FLOOD DOES NOT REQUIRE IT.

THE STRATA WERE STILL WET WHEN DEPOSITED IN RAPID SEQUENCE BY THE FLOOD, AND WHEN THE SAG OCCURRED DUE TO THE LIGHTER SALT LAYER GRAVITY DREW THE SEDIMENTS TOWARD THE LOW PART OF THE SAG

DENY CONTINUITY? THEY WERE ALL LAID DOWN ONE ON TOP OF THE OTHER IN THE EXACT SAME FORM.

PROVE THAT THE SEDIMENTS STILL BEING DEPOSITED ARE CONTINUOUS WITH THE EXISTING GEO CVOLUMN.

I'D HAVE TO LOOK AT THE CROSS SECTION AGAIN BUT THE SALT RISES, THE SEDIMENTS ABOVE IT SANK

AT THE END OF THE FLOOD.

AND I'VE ANSWERED YOU. WHAT YOU ATTRIBUTE TO ANY TIME PERIOD WITHIN THE GEO GOLUMN OCCURRED AFTER ALL THE STRATA WERE LAID DOWN

dON'T KNOW BUT THEY OCCUR IN SOME PLACES AS PART OF THE GEO COLUMN. YOU CAN GET A SENSE OF THE TIMING FROM HOW LONG IT TAKES SALT DOMES TO RISE.

THE TIMING GEOLOGY IMPUTES TO WHATEVER LAYER WAS WASHED OFF THE CURRENT UPPERMOST LAYER OF THE GRAND STAIRCASE WOULD GIVE YOU THE "AGE" OF THE END OF THE FLOOD, WHICH WAS OF COURSE SOMEWHERE IN THAT YEAR OF ITS TRANSGRESSION AND RECESSION.

BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH