Evidence of the flood

Well, that was predictable.So are you saying that there are no sediments being deposited on the bottom of the ocean now?Or are you saying that the end of the flood was in the Holocene?

But it is representative of what happened in the Flood as is every other stratigraphic column. The strata were all deposited one after another in rapid succession during the Flood and that re

But it is representative of what happened in the Flood as is every other stratigraphic column. The strata were all deposited one after another in rapid succession during the Flood and that represents the entire extent of the Geo Time Scale everywhere.

To avoid confusion of columns of strata with the geologic timescale I'll instead use the term stratigraphic column.The only thing what you say makes clear is that you don't know what a stratigraphic column is. Certainly it consists of strata that formed from gradually accumulating sediments, but strata formed from sediments deposited at any rate are included too, as well of volcanic deposits, and igneous and metamorphic rock.--Percy

What is the model, method, mechanism, process or procedure for your flud to deposit millions of alternating layers of fine silt covered by coarser silt?Someone may have asked that question once or twice before.Edited by jar, : appalin spallin, there is no 0 in millions

In that case, where are the huge sandstone deposits of the Colorado Plateau in Great Britain? Where are the coal seams in the Superior Province?Sorry, note even remotely.

Why not?Please explain.

WHY SHOULD THE FLOOD HAVE DEPOSITED THE SAME THING EVERYWHERE? AS IT IS IT SEEMS TO HAVE ALMOST DONE THAT ANYWAY BUT THERE'S NO REASON IT HAD TO.

THEY WOULD NOT HAVE THE SAME FORM AS THE ACTUAL GEO/STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN, BUT NOBODY WILL ANSWER MY REQUEST TO PROVE IT, WHICH I TAKE AS EVIDENCE THAT THERE IS NO SUCH EVIDENCE.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

What is the model, method, mechanism, process or procedure for your flud to deposit millions of alternating layers of fine silt covered by coarser silt?Someone may have asked that question once or twice before.

Best of luck unsticking your capslock key soon!As I said earlier, the issue is one of definitions. The geologic column, or more precisely the stratigraphic column at any point in the world, begins where your feet touch the ground. It is not buried beneath the soil. The soil is part of the stratigraphic column - it is the very top of the stratigraphic column.Anything that deposits atop the stratigraphic column adds to it and is continuous with it, and unwarranted and unsupported protestations in all caps cannot change that.--Percy

I AM ABANDONING THIS THREAD. IT HAS BECOME THE USUAL INSANE DISCONNECT. THIS IS A PARADIGM PROBLEM AND IT CANNOT BE RESOLVED HERE.

What is the model, method, mechanism, process or procedure for your flud to deposit millions of alternating layers of fine silt covered by coarser silt?Someone may have asked that question once or twice before.Please understand that the question will still be waiting for your answer when you try claiming the flud did something.

How dare I? You mean how dare I accurately describe your rude and insulting behavior? If you don't like being called out on it then I suggest you stop doing it.There's a discussion trying to take place in this thread that deserves far better than one-liner responses in all caps. It deserves careful thought and investigation, and the people you're discussing with deserve your respect and consideration.--Percy

You seem to be the one with a problem. I hope you're able to calm down soon and begin some kind of discussion that goes beyond redeclaring your basic positions from their starting points, and that isn't just meaningless one-liners.--Percy