Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Tension of Faith
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 326 of 1540 (821897)
10-14-2017 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 324 by Faith
10-14-2017 12:43 PM


Posting the truth whether you are here or not.
Faith writes:
No unbeliever can do that, you're just displaying the usual pernicious anti-Christian EvC bias, as are jar and Percy.
Once again, reality simply shows you are wrong. I am not displaying any anti-Christian bias since the reality, the fact, the truth is that I am and continue to be a Cradle Creedal Christian.
Faith writes:
However, again, the logic is correct for the premise as given.
Even if that were true, which of course reality shows your position is not true, reality trumps logic. It's very possible to have a logical statement that is factually wrong and when people make claims like Biblical Inerrancy that do not stand up when compared to reality your imagined logical assertions are simply wrong.
The God character in the Genesis 2&3 stories does not show a fall, does not show a separation, does not show a fallen mind but rather specifically says that thanks to the gift in the Garden of Eden human minds were expanded and improved to be god-like.
I have to ask Faith, have you ever actually read Genesis 2&3?
quote:
Genesis 3:22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil:

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 324 by Faith, posted 10-14-2017 12:43 PM Faith has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 335 of 1540 (821916)
10-15-2017 9:53 AM
Reply to: Message 334 by foreveryoung
10-15-2017 8:49 AM


foreveryoung writes:
Percy said "Aside from God's fictionality". Do you have proof of his fictionality?
The Bible itself is really good and massive evidence of God's fictionality. One clear example is that the God character in Genesis 1 is entirely different than the God character in Genesis 2&3.
The God found in Genesis 1 is competent, overarching, sure, decisive but also separate, aloof and not interacting with the creation.
The God in Genesis 2&3 is unsure, ignorant, bumbling, fearful, learning on the job, dishonest but also human, empathetic, caring, and in direct interaction with the creation.
The Gods of the Bible are all fictional caricatures and plot devices.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 334 by foreveryoung, posted 10-15-2017 8:49 AM foreveryoung has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 344 of 1540 (821940)
10-15-2017 3:43 PM
Reply to: Message 343 by Percy
10-15-2017 3:19 PM


Re: Evolving theology
Percy writes:
GDR writes:
All the New Testament writers wrote that God resurrected Jesus. I objectively know that.
You mean the Gospels, or are you claiming that every single NT writer "wrote that God resurrected Jesus." Did they really write that "God resurrected Jesus"? Didn't they more write things like, "He is risen", leaving open who did it?
Of course the Book of James doesn't even mention Jesus' death or resurrection or even his divinity but rather seems to use "Lord" as an honorific or title similar to Prince or Dear Leader.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 343 by Percy, posted 10-15-2017 3:19 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 349 of 1540 (821945)
10-15-2017 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 348 by Percy
10-15-2017 8:59 PM


Re: Evolving theology
Percy writes:
Am I wrong about that? Is my view of traditional Christianity that flawed? What do other Christians say when you tell them that, for example, you don't consider Jesus dying for your sins a fundamental tenet of Christianity?
It's not that unusual a position, particularly within the liberal branches of Christianity.
It's not that unusual even when looking through a Biblical lens. Most of the references to Jesus in the New Testament are of Jesus teaching about behavior after all.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by Percy, posted 10-15-2017 8:59 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 356 of 1540 (822014)
10-17-2017 2:05 PM
Reply to: Message 355 by GDR
10-17-2017 1:30 PM


Re: Evolving theology
GDR writes:
Lazarus was resuscitated. His death was the same, other than for the time factor, as someone who dies on the operating table and is brought back to life and later dies. Jesus' was resurrected with a renewed body that is not subject to a later death.
That's another of the dogma examples that just seems silly, juvenile. Sorry but it really doesn't seem to have any meaning or value.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 355 by GDR, posted 10-17-2017 1:30 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 357 by GDR, posted 10-17-2017 3:38 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 358 of 1540 (822020)
10-17-2017 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 357 by GDR
10-17-2017 3:38 PM


Re: Evolving theology
GDR writes:
It's the only reason for the Christian faith. If not for the resurrection there is no basis for Christianity. If not for the resurrection Jesus wouldn't even be a foot note in human history and he would simply have been another failed messiah like others before and after Him.
If that is true then there is no value in Christianity and it should just be a footno0te if even that. Jesus is a failed Messiah which is why the Christian Marketers changed the definition of what the Messiah would be.
If that is the sole reason for Christianity then it is of no value whatsoever.
I happen to think Christianity is far more then just that.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 357 by GDR, posted 10-17-2017 3:38 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 364 by GDR, posted 10-17-2017 9:21 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 363 of 1540 (822031)
10-17-2017 9:10 PM
Reply to: Message 361 by foreveryoung
10-17-2017 8:47 PM


utter nonsense from foreveryoung
foreveryoung writes:
What do we know about the God of the Bible? Is there any source material about him?
Has anyone claimed to have seen the God of the Bible? What did they say about their encounter with him? How many people have claimed to have had encounters with the God of the Bible?
No, of course there is no source material related to the God of the Bible just as there is no "God of the Bible". There are absolutely not original manuscripts of any material in any of the many different "Bibles" created by the different chapters of Club Christian.
There are stories written by unknown authors that contain various tales of encounters with God but they are often inconsistent, shown to evolve over time and retelling and contradictory.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 361 by foreveryoung, posted 10-17-2017 8:47 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 365 of 1540 (822045)
10-18-2017 6:44 AM
Reply to: Message 364 by GDR
10-17-2017 9:21 PM


Re: Evolving theology
GDR writes:
We've gone through this before and your views are simply theistic and could be consistent with most faiths.
Yes, you have made that claim and the only issue is of course that just as with the Bible you are simply taking things out of context.
The fact is that I am a Christian and thus my position is a Christian position.
Sorry Charlie but thems the facts.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 364 by GDR, posted 10-17-2017 9:21 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 367 by GDR, posted 10-18-2017 9:48 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 369 of 1540 (822093)
10-19-2017 6:35 AM
Reply to: Message 367 by GDR
10-18-2017 9:48 PM


Re: Evolving theology
GDR writes:
What is it that is specific to Christianity that you believe?
Well as a Creedal Christian I believe the basics found in the Nicene Creed.
GDR writes:
What would cause you to believe that it is better to follow Jesus as opposed to following Mahatma Gandhi?
Well, Gandhi never started a religion so I am not at all sure what you are asking. And why should I believe that the Path I choose is a better path than that chosen by others? After all, Jesus was never a Christian, Jesus was born, raised and died a Jew. Christianity is a religion created by others, not by Jesus.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 367 by GDR, posted 10-18-2017 9:48 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 371 by GDR, posted 10-19-2017 11:09 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 372 of 1540 (822109)
10-19-2017 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 371 by GDR
10-19-2017 11:09 AM


Re: Evolving theology
GDR writes:
Do you believe this part of the Nicene creed?
There you go taking pieces parts out of context yet again.
And that is where I see your version of Christianity diminishing and perverting Christianity.
I have already said that I believe the Nicene Creed, but I also don't take pieces parts out of it.
GDR writes:
If Jesus was not resurrected then He was as I said simply another failed messiah and as Jesus and Gandhi preached essentially the same message then there is no more reason tho be a Christian and there is to be a Gandhian.
Of course there is no such thing as a Ghandian and I too am often critical of Christians and much of Christianity.
And if you believe the teaching of Christianity hinges on Jesus death, resurrection and ascension then I think you too have simply missed the whole point of Jesus life.
A pity.
But that does not mean you are not a Christian, just a somewhat failed Christian.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 371 by GDR, posted 10-19-2017 11:09 AM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 374 by GDR, posted 10-19-2017 2:16 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 376 of 1540 (822120)
10-19-2017 3:26 PM
Reply to: Message 374 by GDR
10-19-2017 2:16 PM


Re: Evolving theology
GDR writes:
That's nonsense. What you are saying is that you accept the parts of the Nicene Creed which you accept.
And that is simply an incorrect statement. I have told you clearly what I believe and it is time you stopped misrepresenting what I have said.
GDR writes:
I have never claimed, just the opposite in fact, that that is the whole point of Jesus' life. However, without the resurrection Jesus is simply a failed messiah, and there is no more reason to give Him credibility as part of the godhead than Gandhi.
And your posit5ion is still totally irrelevant and has absolutely nothing to do with my beliefs.
You really need to try to actually address what it written to you by me and by others and stop just making stuff up.
Even if Jesus was just another failed Messiah that has nothing to do with what Jesus taught or whether or not I am a Christian.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 374 by GDR, posted 10-19-2017 2:16 PM GDR has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 377 of 1540 (822121)
10-19-2017 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 375 by GDR
10-19-2017 2:19 PM


Re: Evolving theology
GDR writes:
Would you say that Lazarus was resurrected?
Absolutely. and there are at least nine examples of people being resurrected in the Bible.
GDR writes:
Would you say that someone who dies on the operating table and is brought back to life is resurrected.
Nope, I certainly would not. Resurrection has a quality of miracle and an unexplained nature. Medical and even strange such events with rational explanations do not fall into the category of theology where resurrection lies.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 375 by GDR, posted 10-19-2017 2:19 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 378 by GDR, posted 10-19-2017 8:53 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 379 of 1540 (822138)
10-19-2017 9:33 PM
Reply to: Message 378 by GDR
10-19-2017 8:53 PM


Re: Evolving theology
GDR writes:
The references to resurrection the Bible are either about Jesus or the resurrection of all things at the end of time. The accounts of the resurrected Jesus are unlike any other accounts in the Bible. They just aren't the same thing.
Nonsense. Even Paul was resurrected. Sorry but there simply is nothing different about Jesus resurrection from all the other resurrections in the Bible stories. Even Jesus ascension is not unique in the Bible.
But the point remains, even if Jesus never lived, even if Jesus was not resurrected, the teaching contained in the Bible stories can still provide a valid path to guide someones life.
Also the fact of Jesus living, Jesus death, Jesus resurrection and Jesus ascension are irrelevant to the foundational beliefs of Christianity. Even if none of it ever really happened people believed that Jesus did live, did teach, did die, did arise from the dead and did ascend to heaven and that at some future date will judge all.
It is the belief not any reality that is relevant.
In addition, none of that matters in anyway on whether or not I am a Christian.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 378 by GDR, posted 10-19-2017 8:53 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 380 by GDR, posted 10-19-2017 9:48 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 381 of 1540 (822149)
10-20-2017 7:38 AM
Reply to: Message 380 by GDR
10-19-2017 9:48 PM


Re: Evolving theology
LOL
GDR writes:
Sure, but that is something that anyone of any faith or even atheism could agree to. It isn't in any way specific to Christianity. It is simply a good way to live life even if it does leave Jesus being delusional.
Exactly. Doing what Jesus taught, what the Buddha taught before him, what Judaism teaches, what Islam teaches, what most atheist practice, is a good way to live one's life.
That has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not I am a Christian.
Christianity is but one possible path, not "THE Path". It is the path I happened to take. But just as Jesus points out in Luke, just as with the Jews, we are NOT the Chosen People.
Luke 4 writes:
25 But I tell you of a truth, many widows were in Israel in the days of Elias, when the heaven was shut up three years and six months, when great famine was throughout all the land;
26 But unto none of them was Elias sent, save unto Sarepta, a city of Sidon, unto a woman that was a widow.
27 And many lepers were in Israel in the time of Eliseus the prophet; and none of them was cleansed, saving Naaman the Syrian.
All people are God's creation and God's people and that includes those that follow Gandhi and atheists and any faith or no faith.
Christianity is only a collection of paths, not "The Path" and sometimes maybe the right path but too often it seems Christianity is a path that leads nowhere.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 380 by GDR, posted 10-19-2017 9:48 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 382 by GDR, posted 10-20-2017 10:31 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 383 of 1540 (822163)
10-20-2017 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 382 by GDR
10-20-2017 10:31 AM


Re: Evolving theology
GDR writes:
AS I said, you're a cultural Christian. Why on earth do you object to that?
I object because that is simply wrong.
I am NOT a cultural Christian but just a Christian.
It really is that simple.
Maybe it would help if I explained that I am a Christian who no longer thinks as a child.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 382 by GDR, posted 10-20-2017 10:31 AM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 386 by GDR, posted 10-21-2017 12:49 PM jar has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024