Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9042 total)
29 online now:
dwise1, ICANT, PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat), Tangle (5 members, 24 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 885,984 Year: 3,630/14,102 Month: 250/321 Week: 66/44 Day: 8/9 Hour: 1/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   In Memoriam: Asgara
Member (Idle past 11 days)
Posts: 3999
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Message 24 of 38 (820754)
09-26-2017 12:36 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Asgara
09-24-2017 8:00 PM

I'm so sad to read this.

My deepest condolences.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Asgara, posted 09-24-2017 8:00 PM Asgara has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021