Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9035 total)
106 online now:
Aussie, nwr, PaulK, Tangle, xongsmith (5 members, 101 visitors)
Newest Member: Barry Deaborough
Post Volume: Total: 885,633 Year: 3,279/14,102 Month: 220/724 Week: 69/93 Day: 8/18 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Year In Intelligent Design
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8963
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 47 of 50 (844682)
12-03-2018 9:59 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Stile
12-03-2018 2:21 PM


Re: Creation Science vs Regular Science
If you have an undisputed set of observations or facts... then they only ever lead to one single Scientific conclusion.

This is, I think, pretty rare. The set of facts often have multiple possible interpretations. Then there are ongoing arguments, sometimes not friendly, about those conclusions.

Only further facts may finally force a consensus conclusion that may become universal.

I think you have all that in mind with what you subsequently wrote.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Stile, posted 12-03-2018 2:21 PM Stile has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021