The concept of historical sciences being unprovable and untestable is pure poppycock.
I guess if you want to tee up the ball we will smash it. Before you decide to write an OP, I suggest you do a little research on the science of history. Maybe even get a quick over view on how Bayes' Theorem is being used in history.
Here is a quick overview.
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/12742
Richard Carrier has written a whole book on the subject.
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/...-carrier/9781616145590
This will be fun.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.
If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?