Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 60 (9208 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Skylink
Post Volume: Total: 919,421 Year: 6,678/9,624 Month: 18/238 Week: 18/22 Day: 0/9 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The roots of Creation Science and Darwinism
ringo
Member (Idle past 661 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 80 of 89 (833503)
05-22-2018 12:30 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by Phat
05-20-2018 11:24 AM


Re: Spirits or Spiritual Forces.
Phat writes:
So all gods shall be treated equal, eh?
No. Some gods are more plausible than others. The one you wish for is not very plausible.

An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Phat, posted 05-20-2018 11:24 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by Phat, posted 05-22-2018 1:40 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 661 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 83 of 89 (833574)
05-23-2018 8:27 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by Phat
05-22-2018 1:40 PM


Re: Spirits or Spiritual Forces.
Phat writes:
only because you hold Him to the descriptions in the book from a critical standpoint....
No, I'm going by your description. Some of the descriptions in the book are certainly more plausible than yours. Yours is a cherry-picked description.

An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Phat, posted 05-22-2018 1:40 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by Phat, posted 05-24-2018 10:09 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 661 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 87 of 89 (833623)
05-24-2018 11:48 AM
Reply to: Message 84 by Phat
05-24-2018 10:09 AM


Re: Spirits or Spiritual Forces.
Phat writes:
Concerning Creation Science. How does it differ from mainstream science?
"Creation science" is to science as Long John Silver is to a silver tea set. The tea set exists; Long John Silver does not. The similarity of one word is coincidental.

An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by Phat, posted 05-24-2018 10:09 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024