Summations Only

I guess if it's comforting to surround yourself with all your wealth of facts and evidence and just sit there counting it all, go for it. It's just a matter of time before the Flood will wash it all away.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

The initial list: Still waiting for the explanation of how the Flood created any of these facts.Reality ALWAYS trumps dogma and fantasy.

Most obviously the result of the Flood or the tectonic events afterward.

There were no tectonic events afterward. Read your Bible.

Why do you have the silly idea it should be in the Bible?

Why do you have the silly idea that the Bible wouldn't mention such a momentous event immediately after and directed related to the momentous event of the Flood?

I have no problem with anyone's beliefs. They are free to believe whatever they want.As I've mentioned, I don't think that Faith has any idea how her repetitious, over-confident pronouncements sound arrogant and offensive to logical minds. I agree that we do get overwrought and reactive, but really? Those 'beliefs' on a par with science? I'm sorry.

Well, I do appreciate being constrained by facts. It's challenging, but much more satisfying than just making up stories.And I see that you have nothing to contradict my points.Oh, be sure to check my edits to the post your attempted to respond to. Yah, I know, same old stuff, but it all bears repeating.

Obviously because it wasn't momentous. The ark was floating on a sea that stretched from horizon to horizon. The boat may have rocked some or maybe not, nothing momentous. The Bible does mention earthquakes when they affect people.

We're talking about natural forces momentous enough to create enormous rock formations. You want to pretend that they wouldn't have effected the ark at all?

For one thing, the volcanism wasn't under water. There's distinct and obvious differences between lava solidified under water and in the air. So it was after the Fludde receded.

Great Britain happens to be right where the split occurred and probably suffered a lot of bashing and crashing in ways that aren't evident. Perhaps it wasn't even an island before the split? But since the event was worldwide, as are the strata, I don't see th problem of extending the example. The deformation seen in the island had to be the result of that tectonic action, and if so there would not have been any strata laid down after the Jurassic at the time of its occurrence according to the standard idea of when Pangaea broke up, and if that were the case, after it broke up and the strata continued depositing according to the usual time scale, the strata of the Tertiary would have deposited flat, and would have deposited ON TOP OF the strata already present and already deformed. Instead they are part of the whole stack of strata, deformed as a unit with all the rest of them. No idea what this is supposed to mean, or any of the rest of what you say here: Far from the continental rifting that formed the Atlantic Ocean???? Great Britain is where the rifting had to have occurred, there is nothing between it and North America except the Atlantic Ocean, and that means the Atlantic Ridge developed right on what is now its western edge. Here I've got people telling me all this movement would have affected Noah who was floating on the sea over a mountain range in the Middle East at the time, but you are saying Great Britain which was where the continental rift occurred was not disturbed?Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Then explain the most obvious model, method, mechanism, process or procedure your flood used to create each item; or as usual, simply run way.

The Flood laid down all the strata seen in any of the formations that are composed of strata, and then they were shaped by tectonic and erosive forces afterward,. though the salt was obviously carved out by human beings.

That is still no explanation as expected. How did the flood do each single example?