Re: questions on review process, thoroughness, etc.
If an apologist makes claims not supported by the actual written records then YES, they are simply carny snake oil salesmen.
It is not a matter of reasoning Phat but simple reality and honesty. To say the God in Genesis 1 is the same God as in Genesis 2&3 is simply denial of reality as written. To claim there is a Fall in Genesis 2&3 is simply denial of the reality as written.
Credentials mean absolutely NOTHING unless supported by facts and reality. Content Phat, not source. Source is irrelevant!
What was posted above what simply smoke and mirrors, an attempt to sway by emotion and totally devoid of any meaningful content.