Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 83 (9005 total)
66 online now:
AZPaul3, jar, PaulK, ramoss, Son Goku (5 members, 61 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Upcoming Birthdays: AdminPhat
Post Volume: Total: 881,038 Year: 12,786/23,288 Month: 511/1,527 Week: 190/207 Day: 12/39 Hour: 1/0

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Time Dilation, the Hubble Shift and God's Eternal Universe
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


(1)
Message 18 of 189 (862738)
09-11-2019 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Captcass
09-11-2019 7:45 PM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
Your journal is a known fringe psudo-science rag with no effect or respect within the discipline.

I'm afraid your paper means nothing to the reality of this universe.

journal


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Captcass, posted 09-11-2019 7:45 PM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Captcass, posted 09-11-2019 11:44 PM AZPaul3 has responded

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


(1)
Message 20 of 189 (862743)
09-12-2019 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Captcass
09-11-2019 11:44 PM


Re: Final Paper Has Been Published
So...take your attitude and .... Don't bother replying to this, as I do not engage with lost, bitter, hate filled people like you. You need manners and decency to speak with me.

Your deflection does not alter the reality.

Not just me ... I am nothing. The rest of this community and the discipline at large, however, know this journal, and now you, for the pseudo-science you both practice.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Captcass, posted 09-11-2019 11:44 PM Captcass has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-12-2019 12:20 AM AZPaul3 has acknowledged this reply

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


(4)
Message 113 of 189 (862925)
09-17-2019 7:19 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by Captcass
09-16-2019 10:32 PM


Re: questions on review process, thoroughness, etc.
That is one of the symptoms. You have no idea what is going on here.

We have experienced here and on other sites across the internet the appearance of the religio-science prophets who swear on a stack of their own un-peered tomes that they above all else in the history of man have the one true answer whether that be a new refutation of Einstein or Heisenberg or the discovery of the definitive proof of the existence of their favorite gods.

The insistence on their own intellect and foresight which cannot be challenged by mere mortals nor questioned by their lack of experience or training or past reputation in some discipline is a telltale of the genre. The “mainstream is lamestream” meme and its corresponding conspiracy by the rest of humanity to keep their brilliance crushed is yet another.

But, I see and feel your frustrations at the reactions you are receiving here and before you go off all pissed I feel compelled to let you know, from my perspective, what is happening here.

You’re a crackpot, Captcass. That is why you are here instead of having these conversations in the “Letters to the Editor” section of Nature.

And you’re a rather entertaining one.

Many here are having fun with you. That is one of the delights of EvC. We get to have great fun with crackpots.

I know this isn’t what you want to hear, Captain, but at this point you are being used for the entertainment value not the intellectual.

I don’t want to discourage your participation here, Captain. You may have other insights that prove equally entertaining. Some may even be enlightening; a new perspective on our discussions.

We can all wait and see any reaction to your published postulate. I wouldn’t expect much if I were you but you just never know (except in this case, truthfully, we know what to expect).

In the meantime I’m thinking some here might be interested in your political, religious, moral, philosophical offerings in some of these other discussion threads. I don’t think we’ve ever had a Buchrishinjewmus here before.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Captcass, posted 09-16-2019 10:32 PM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by Captcass, posted 09-17-2019 10:24 AM AZPaul3 has responded

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


(2)
Message 118 of 189 (862951)
09-17-2019 2:44 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by Captcass
09-17-2019 10:24 AM


Re: questions on review process, thoroughness, etc.
Also so glad you can speak for everyone else who is following this thread.

You missed the "I feel compelled to let you know, from my perspective, what is happening here" part of my post. I can only speak for me.

But,

You got the spirit and I appreciate the push back.

Now, rather belatedly, welcome to EvC Capt. Crackpot! You're gonna fit right in.

Do we affect what we observe? Can that be utilized by us as a tool? Or do you just want to ignore that part of QM?

The observer effect? Really?

Are you saying that if we observe you being crackpot you will change? We lookin' at you Cap'n.

The only parts of QM we ignore are those bastardized convolutions that lead to such things as cosmic consciousness, power crystals and a universal cosmic intelligence.

You see, I think people who "believe" in the undefinable singularity and infinitely accelerating expansion of the universe to be crackpots.

Good for you. No one who comprehends the physics of GM "believes" in a singularity. We already know the "singularity" is a placeholder for our ignorance at that extreme.

And the "infinitely accelerating expansion of the universe" is something you just made up since there is no such beast in the scientific literature that I can find. There is an expansion, even an accelerating expansion, but an "infinitely accelerating expansion"? What is that? Right now H0 appears quite finite at about 70 (km/s)/Mpc

And then there are those crackpots who don't even realize Life is part of the universe even though they are alive!

I know what you mean. It boggles my mind that anyone can live in this universe and not know they live in this universe.

The universe is observing itself through them and they are too blind to see that!

What I find mindblowing is the fact that some pond scum GSWMAML has evolved to the point where we can dare to contemplate anything about this universe at all. Barely six million years off the trees and we're digesting the light from the farthest galaxies and sending robots to other worlds. Damn smart monkeys we are.

And the folk here who like to humiliate people have severe social deficiencies. I don't know if you know it or not, but that is considered cruel behavior.

Yeah but here among friends it's ok.

how does our affecting what we observe affect what we get?

Do you know that in quantum mechanics an "observer" doesn't have to be a conscious being but anything that gets in the way and thus resolves a property of the particle in question? Like hitting an electron momentarily resolves the question of position of another particle.

The moon really doesn't cease to exist just because you're not looking at it. There are plenty of particles zipping hither and yon banging into everything and jostling their neighbors to keep this classical world from dissolving into some kind of weird quantum phantasm. The quantum fields with all these particles remain. They do not disappear.

When we observe something, and influence it, are we not influencing the evolution of the unverse, the quantum field?

Which quantum field? There are dozens of them. There is at least one for each particle in the Standard Model.

If we affect what we see, are we all not influencing the evolution of the universe just by opening our eyes?

Frankly I doubt that the universe knows or cares what we see or do or rub in our navels. Couldn't care less.

Edited by AZPaul3, : For Tanypteryx


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Captcass, posted 09-17-2019 10:24 AM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Captcass, posted 09-17-2019 3:14 PM AZPaul3 has responded
 Message 120 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-17-2019 3:37 PM AZPaul3 has responded
 Message 138 by Son Goku, posted 09-23-2019 10:29 AM AZPaul3 has responded

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


(2)
Message 121 of 189 (862961)
09-17-2019 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Captcass
09-17-2019 3:14 PM


Re: questions on review process, thoroughness, etc.
Exactly, your model doesn't work at either end of the spectrum.

But it does work fantastically well through the whole vast rest of reality which is about all of reality more than your model which doesn't work anywhere.

Yes, we all are ignorant about a lot of things. Only a crackpot would think otherwise.

Hell, the Standard Model is a flop. The Higg's wasn't even a Higg's.

Such a productive well tested ushered in the most prolific scientific and technical advancements in all of human history kind of a flop. Some flop.

And to replace it you have what? Ghosts, gods, demons and devils? Good luck making a smart phone out of that.

And frankly, Captain, I don't think you would know a Higgs boson if it stepped up and punched you in the nose. You probably still think in the popular vernacular that it's supposed to some kind of field of molasses through which particles tredge to gain mass.

You proclaim theory to be known fact over and over again....

Theory. Yes.

You really have no idea what "theory" means do you?
Remember, this is a science thread.
That's a hint, by the way.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Captcass, posted 09-17-2019 3:14 PM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Captcass, posted 09-17-2019 4:19 PM AZPaul3 has responded

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


(1)
Message 123 of 189 (862963)
09-17-2019 4:32 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by Tanypteryx
09-17-2019 3:37 PM


Re: questions on review process, thoroughness, etc.
I hate the term "pond scum" because it is intended to be derogatory...

But you had no problem with my characterization of us as monkeys? Is it because monkeys are soft and cuddly while pond scum is literally crawling with life all gooey slimy and wet?

You like gooey slimy and wet? OK, so do I.

You win. From now on instead of pond scum I'll call it the gooey slimy wet matrix of abundant microscopic life. GSWMAML for short.

See the correction in my post.

every time I go to sleep, you and the rest of the Universe disappear...

I solve that by sleeping with one eye open.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-17-2019 3:37 PM Tanypteryx has acknowledged this reply

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


(3)
Message 124 of 189 (862965)
09-17-2019 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by Captcass
09-17-2019 4:19 PM


Re: questions on review process, thoroughness, etc.
They expected either of two masses, 15 ...

You been smoking something? You really haven't a clue?

The models expected the Higgs mass in the 100 to 200 GeV range which is why both ATLAS and CMS were looking in that range. It was found at 125 GeV.

Your self serving revisionist history, especially the wildly bad numbers, is horrible here. Are you not the least bit aware of the subject? Or is this another one of those "Don't bother me with facts. I have my own" things you religious nutjobs practice so well?

The evolving quantum (spacetime) field..

Your time to shine. Explain.

Start with how you quantized spacetime. The Bicrossproduct model? q-Deformed spacetime model? One of the various Heisenberg models?

Show your math.

And then, if you would please, explain how a quantum field "evolves" or are you just saying it changes as any other quantum field would with various excitations?

You have an audience. Go.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Captcass, posted 09-17-2019 4:19 PM Captcass has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by 1.61803, posted 09-17-2019 5:49 PM AZPaul3 has acknowledged this reply

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 127 of 189 (862976)
09-17-2019 10:21 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Captcass
09-17-2019 6:33 PM


Re: questions on review process, thoroughness, etc.
Your Message 94
quote:
I am not a Christian. I am a Buchrishinjewmus

Indeed, you don't know what my religion is. Buchrishinjewmus? That would mean I am a member of AA.

You miss the last few meetings? Fall off the wagon again? Can't remember your own religion?

Can you remember your name, Cass? If not just say so I'll remind you.

I stand corrected. Been a long time since I thought about that....

You really need to get back to those meetings.

I haven't mentioned "religion" at all except to say spiritually there are gross errors.

Do I need to quote the relevant part of your paper? To what do you think a universal cosmic intelligence refers? In these parts (planet Earth) that's religion.

Explain.

That is why I wrote the paper.

OK, you're a newbie. Forum rules.

quote:
5. Bare links with no supporting discussion should be avoided. Make the argument in your own words and use links as supporting references.

6. Avoid lengthy cut-n-pastes. Introduce the point in your own words and provide a link to your source as a reference. If your source is not on-line you may contact the Site Administrator to have it made available on-line.


This is a science thread, so you say something in English (you do remember that don't you? How many of those meetings did you miss? ) and we get to rip it apart. Your paper is noted as reference, no problem, but we will not discuss this with a paper. We will, if you go along, discuss this with Captcass.

So, Captain "Fall off the Wagon" Crackpot, how did you quantize spacetime and explain how your quantum (spacetime) field "evolves"?

Shouldn't be too terribly hard to explain. You did write the paper on this, right? You do remember writing the paper? I could give you a URL reference if you want.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Captcass, posted 09-17-2019 6:33 PM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Captcass, posted 09-17-2019 11:50 PM AZPaul3 has responded

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


(1)
Message 129 of 189 (862981)
09-18-2019 1:41 AM
Reply to: Message 128 by Captcass
09-17-2019 11:50 PM


Re: questions on review process, thoroughness, etc.
Normally I wouldn't take it so personally, but my mother passed yesterday and, well,

Then what the hell are you doing here? Go be with family.

Condolences.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Captcass, posted 09-17-2019 11:50 PM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by Captcass, posted 09-18-2019 10:18 AM AZPaul3 has acknowledged this reply

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 139 of 189 (863240)
09-23-2019 11:11 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Son Goku
09-23-2019 10:29 AM


Re: questions on review process, thoroughness, etc.
Sorta like a girlfriend.

It’s not her mood when you ask her. It’s what she’ll tell you her mood is in retaliation for not having divined what her mood is.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Son Goku, posted 09-23-2019 10:29 AM Son Goku has not yet responded

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5295
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 143 of 189 (864039)
10-05-2019 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by Captcass
10-05-2019 2:18 PM


Re: Quantum Theory
Let me know when MIT, Perimeter or Stanford invites you to guest lecture on your model. Until then I'm not interested.

Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Captcass, posted 10-05-2019 2:18 PM Captcass has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by Captcass, posted 10-05-2019 11:40 PM AZPaul3 has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020