Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9057 total)
483 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, nwr, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Tangle, vimesey (7 members, 476 visitors)
Newest Member: drlove
Post Volume: Total: 889,845 Year: 957/6,534 Month: 957/682 Week: 10/182 Day: 10/27 Hour: 2/3

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   The Evolution Theory is a Myth Equivalent to the Flat Earth Theory
Posts: 636
Joined: 07-20-2006

Message 12 of 248 (836046)
07-08-2018 6:41 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by forexhr
07-08-2018 9:47 AM

Blogging From the Beyond
I want to respond to you OP but am unable to do so since I am dead. In fact, all of us are dead. Or at least we would be if your analysis had any validity since the process that you determine to be impossible is exactly the process that our adaptive immune cells use to produce antibodies, those pesky little molecular combinations that protect us from invasive pathogens (and many causes of death). At least it’s nice to know that I didn’t die from cancer since your math proves that the molecular modifications required to mutate cells to oncogenic forms is impossible. Thank you for that.

Actually, if you are really interested in how to properly address the mathematics you are attempting you can read about the brilliant work of Andreas Wagner and his team at the University of Zurich, which is described in his very readable book: “Arrival of the Fittest: How Nature Innovates”.

There is an old saying: Seeing is believing.
This old saying is false.
People don’t believe what they are seeing.
People believe what they are told they are seeing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by forexhr, posted 07-08-2018 9:47 AM forexhr has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by forexhr, posted 07-09-2018 3:37 AM AnswersInGenitals has not yet responded

Posts: 636
Joined: 07-20-2006

Message 139 of 248 (836528)
07-18-2018 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by forexhr
07-18-2018 4:19 AM

Stormy whether
forexhr writes:

For example, the are trillions upon trillions of molecular rearrangements in non-living nature every second. But, have they resulted in arrangements that are for e.g. meaningful in the context of human needs?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by forexhr, posted 07-18-2018 4:19 AM forexhr has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022