A Book about the Anti-Trump Conspiracy

You cannot prove it just by saying that you know it. What you would do instead is offer an argument for your position. Your argument might include an explanation of why the examples of racism others present are not racism, examples of things he has done that indicate that he is not racist, and arguments that he did not do the racist things.Of course, you might expect rebuttals of your arguments. You could try to rebut the rebuttals. I would expect that if the discussion ever got that far, you'd have long since returned to just calling us Liberal Nazi fascists and claiming that we were trying to shut you up using Maoist tactics.So it is probably not worth the trouble of going through all of that. Just do you.

I know. That begs the question of why you are here posting in debate forums when debating is not what you care to do. Wouldn't you be happier exchanging words with like-minded people who already believe exactly as you do?

Based on your whining about your reception, we know that you are not content. But why start a whole new thread if you don't really want to discuss anything? You could have posted this stuff to one of the existing threads.

He believed it based on what exactly, Faith?

Spewing out things like "Liberal Nazi" surely aren't examples of civilized discussion. You are not here to debate or discuss. You are here to state your position and then complain about not having your words accepted as truth.How about just a little bit of introspection/ Maybe once in every 10 threads you start?

Do you have any arguments. Is your only contribution assertions and indignation? Everybody else here can assert facts backed up by sources. And all you can do is rattle off a conspiracy theory.Why isn't there a single conservative poster who can make a case for Trump being right without resorting to little more than making assertions and claiming that every source that documents Trump's worst statements are all wrong.I can make a case for Trump having a toxic agenda just by quoting Trump's own statements. I can also defend that case against your accusations of misquoting. But it never comes to that because all you ever do is assert and whine.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Folks who attack character are supposed to back up they say. Their defenders ought be about addressing facts instead of making assertions.Part of the discussion here is about Trump's character. If you don't believe that to be important, that's one thing. I happen to think that the president's character is worth discussing.Do you have any facts? Are you ready to deal in a fact based discussion about Trump's character, or do you want to just complain?

Make your case. With facts. No need to shout.