Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A truly chilling new poll on American attitudes about the media
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 18 (837785)
08-09-2018 9:06 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by jar
08-09-2018 8:14 AM


Me, those numbers are actually more positive than I was expecting. Considering that polls have consistently been giving Trump a 40% approval rating and a bit less than 40% lean Republican on the generic Congressional ballot (those numbers may become irrelevant now once the primaries are all over and the actual candidates are set in the elections), I would have expected much worse numbers.
-
Likewise, most Americans (72%) think it should be easier to sue reporters who knowingly publish false information.
Notice the phrasing: "knowingly publish false information". And this is a pretty general statement. I'm guessing that any specific proposal to enact such a thing would end up with little support.
-
I'm not advocating complacency here. I'm just not as worried as perhaps I should be, especially since that same report has this:
First off, the good news. The large majority of Americans, 85%, agree that the Freedom of the press is essential for American democracy. Additionally, two-thirds (68%) say that reporters should be protected from pressure from government or big business interests. Majorities of both Democrats and Republicans agree with these two statements signaling deep support for the concept of freedom of the press.
-
Again, I don't advocate complacency. The PATRIOT Act was enacted in the aftermath of 9/11, showing that all it takes is one huge catastrophe to create a temporary (although "temproary" may still be a rather long time) acceptance of bad legislation; citizens must always be vigilant and be ready to block such nonsense until the initial panic finally subsides.
I don't think the danger here is that US citizens will support restrictions on the press. The danger is that a sudden and temporary panic may cause US citizens to allow dangerous legislation to be enacted without proper thought and debate.
Added by edit:
It would be an interesting context to know how these numbers compare historically. Americans have always supported a free press, but Americans have also always had a poor opinion of the existing media outlets.
Edited by Chiroptera, : No reason given.


Oh, God! Pride of Man, broken in the dust again! -- Quicksilver Messenger Service

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 08-09-2018 8:14 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by PaulK, posted 08-09-2018 12:56 PM Chiroptera has seen this message but not replied
 Message 10 by Taq, posted 08-09-2018 4:52 PM Chiroptera has seen this message but not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


(2)
Message 7 of 18 (837796)
08-09-2018 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by jar
08-09-2018 11:23 AM


Re: Freedom
Historically, in the US whenever restrictions - official or private - have been put in place against free expression, it has more often than not been partisan attacks against movements that I support.
That kind of colors my opinion.


Oh, God! Pride of Man, broken in the dust again! -- Quicksilver Messenger Service

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by jar, posted 08-09-2018 11:23 AM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024