Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 83 (8942 total)
32 online now:
DrJones*, jar, Tangle, Tanypteryx (4 members, 28 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: John Sullivan
Post Volume: Total: 863,486 Year: 18,522/19,786 Month: 942/1,705 Week: 194/518 Day: 18/50 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Tribute Thread For the Recently Raptured Faith
Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 19 of 1677 (838996)
08-31-2018 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Tangle
08-31-2018 4:39 AM


This is sad news.

My deepest condolences to her family and friends.

ABE: or not as the case may seem.

?

Edited by Larni, : Totally misread the OP.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Tangle, posted 08-31-2018 4:39 AM Tangle has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019