So Rush Limbaugh this morning gave the most likely explanation, that of course the Izquierdo/**** somehow fails to know about: it was the NYTimes that ****, not Trump, the whole point being the usual: to put out fake news designed to make Trump look bad, look **** a ****, whatever, although they are the ones who ****. As usual. The deal with Mexico that everone started out calling a win for Trump, really is a win for Trump, but the ********* just can't allow Trump to win anything , not for long anyway. So here comes the fake news to kill it.
Thanks to the Dragonfly more words are now coming under the Mad Censor's poison deleter, so if you want to know what I'm saying use "Peek." If you don't care what I'm saying the Censor is making it easier for you. He doesn't **** anything that tells it **** it is about the ****. That way he preserves the one-sided politics of EvC.
He reported on the successful deal on Friday and all this debunker came down over the weekend. It's typical ******* Fake News, so that's how I'm likely to view it.
As far as evidence goes, he mentioned that as usual the NYT didn't give any evidence, referred only to unnamed sources which could even be invented by them. If they aren't giving evidence why should Limbaugh? His speculations are just as good as theirs.
Even if it were literally true that the deal was made months ago it's still the same deal, still the same win for Trump. Why wouldn't it be? In any case Mexico didn't start implementing its end of the deal until Friday, and that's the real news anyway.
What specifically is in the deal that supposedly was reached Friday? What specifically is Mexico going to start doing that they have not been doing? How specifically is Mexico going to stop migrants and asylum seekers, shoot them all?
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
What I've heard is that they detain the people in Mexico, process asylum seekers there, have dispatched some 6000 troops to manage them. Sending many of them back too I think. Basically what we have to do when they reach our border although we've run out of facilities and people necessary to handle them. Not to mention our demented laws that don't let us send them back.
Mexico agreed to send 6,000 of their newly formed National Guard to the Guatemalan border. Exactly what actions they may take we don't know.
Mexico will expand holding asylum seekers returned to Mexico after their initial application.
The two countries will hold further talks on a "safe third country" agreement which would force most asylum seekers to seek asylum in Mexico rather than the US.
Trump said that there's a secret "very important part" that will be revealed someday. Trump also tweeted "MEXICO HAS AGREED TO IMMEDIATELY BEGIN BUYING LARGE QUANTITIES OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT FROM OUR GREAT PATRIOT FARMERS!", which Mexico denies and which seems pretty weird since the Mexican government doesn't buy our food, private entities do, and the government can't force them to buy more.