Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8943 total)
29 online now:
Diomedes, dwise1, jar, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Theodoric, vimesey (7 members, 22 visitors)
Newest Member: LaLa dawn
Upcoming Birthdays: DrJones*
Post Volume: Total: 864,050 Year: 19,086/19,786 Month: 1,506/1,705 Week: 312/446 Day: 51/59 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Any practical use for Universal Common Ancestor?
Porkncheese
Member (Idle past 110 days)
Posts: 123
Joined: 08-25-2017


Message 66 of 1362 (843944)
11-23-2018 8:41 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dredge
11-20-2018 8:07 AM


Aussie
Hey Dredge. Fellow Aussie here.
I know exactly what you are saying mate.
Funny thing is no one else does...
Hehehe...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dredge, posted 11-20-2018 8:07 AM Dredge has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by Dredge, posted 03-08-2019 12:16 AM Porkncheese has not yet responded

    
Porkncheese
Member (Idle past 110 days)
Posts: 123
Joined: 08-25-2017


Message 304 of 1362 (850011)
03-28-2019 12:05 PM


Any practical use for Universal Common Ancestor?
Any practical use for Universal Common Ancestor?
Off course not. There is real science that is applied in practice like most branches of Biology and Physics. Based on knowledge and understanding it holds an extremely high standard of evidence that is falsifiable

Then there is theoretical science. Untestable hypothesis based on speculation. As with all pseudosciences the objective is to generate funding.

Just look at the centuries of debate and experiments on Spontaneous Generation that theoretical science tried to repress.

And no sooner did Louis Pasteur killed the theory in 1859 did theoretical biolgy jump straight into a totally new theory and preaching it as fact. Darwins "Origin of Species" was also released in 1859.

This time they went even further producing frauds like the pitdown man in a sad and desperate attempt to make the theory stick. Pitdown man was the basis of this pseudoscience for over 100 years before it was embarrassingly uncovered as a deliberate hoax.

Such a sad excuse for science are the soft, theoretical subjects.
Attracting funding away from the real hard sciences like medicine.

Even physics has turned all darwinist theoretical. Astrophysicists thought they were on the verge of a breakthrough in understanding. However Newton and Einsteins maths doesn't work in space.... Hehehehe

The conclusive theory is that something is creating multiple universes only a tiny amount of them produce life. Sounds a lot like Darwinism to me.

The past 16 months iv been on an atheist forum. So now im really woke on their views and motives.

Anyways there is something in there that will trigger someone and send them to the cry cabinet. Wah

Edited by Porkncheese, : No reason given.


Replies to this message:
 Message 305 by JonF, posted 03-28-2019 12:29 PM Porkncheese has not yet responded
 Message 307 by Tangle, posted 03-28-2019 12:56 PM Porkncheese has not yet responded
 Message 308 by ringo, posted 03-28-2019 12:56 PM Porkncheese has not yet responded
 Message 309 by Theodoric, posted 03-28-2019 1:10 PM Porkncheese has not yet responded
 Message 343 by Dredge, posted 04-02-2019 2:58 AM Porkncheese has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019