Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2

Such idiotic comparisons are typical of Darwinoid propaganda. It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic and dishonest.

Please describe a nested hierarchy that includes pre-Cambrian and Cambrian biota.

I already have ... and many more than just one ... most of the novel Phyla that appeared in the Cambrian explosion. A Phylum that appears in the fossil record with no evolutionary history isn't part of a nested hierarchy.

I understand that, as an atheist, it's very easy for APauling to believe the Darwinian bedtime story ... despite what the fossil record says.

Atheism has its fair share of fundamentalist nut jobs as well ... although I prefer to call them fruit-cakes.

Er, no ... you are a tad confused. Science can only scratch the surface of reality, since science cannot perceive the supernatural and the divine.It would appear you're suffering from SMS - Shallow Mind Syndrome. My heart goes out to you ... it's an APauling affliction.

As an atheist, all you've got to look forward to is old age, sickness and death. Good luck with that.

Anyone who claims there is no God and no after-life must have died and seen what's on the other side, then come back to tell us. How did people like APauling do that? It's an astonishing feat!!

"For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them.
Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse" (Romans 1:19-20)

I've noticed. That's what happens when atheist fantasies about the history of life on earth replaces true science.

Their claims about God are as embarrassing as some of their claims about science.

qs=Tangled]Atheists tend to be rational so that's unlikely, but whatever the proportion, your comment is irrelevant.[/qs] Yeah, right ... atheists are so rational that they believe in the profoundly irrational superstition that life on earth began naturally. Fundamentalist atheist fruit-cakes aplenty.
​ Sophistry. The vast majority of evolutionary biologists are atheists.

Yeah, right ... atheists are so rational that they believe in the profoundly irrational superstition that life on earth began naturally. Fundamentalist atheist fruit-cakes aplenty.
​ Sophistry. The vast majority of evolutionary biologists are atheists.

A dose of reality for you ..."The question of religious belief among US scientists has been debated since early in the century. Our latest survey finds that, among the top natural scientists, disbelief is greater than ever — almost total."
Leading scientists still reject God | NatureAccording to a survey conducted among
Fellows of the Royal Society of London, more than 90% of them working in the Biological Sciences were evidently atheists, having disagreed with the following statement:"I believe that there is a strong likelihood that a supernatural being such as God exists or has existed."The paper concluded with,
"We set out to investigate whether or not preeminent British scientists share their American colleagues’ rejection of supernatural religion and found that they do."
Eminent scientists reject the supernatural: a survey of the Fellows of the Royal Society | Evolution: Education and Outreach | Full Text"A survey of all 517 NAS members in biological and physical sciences resulted in just over half responding. 72.2% were overtly atheistic, 20.8% agnostic, and only 7.0% believed in a personal God. Belief in God and immortality was lowest among biologists."
National Academy of Science is Godless to the Core–Survey | Answers in Genesis

"The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God.'" Psalm 14:1