Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 57 (9054 total)
61 online now:
PaulK (1 member, 60 visitors)
Newest Member: EWolf
Post Volume: Total: 888,321 Year: 5,967/14,102 Month: 115/438 Week: 47/112 Day: 2/8 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2
Inactive Member

Message 2 of 294 (844512)
12-01-2018 8:54 AM

Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2 thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.
Hello, P&C. Yes, its me again...the nosy administrator. I reviewed your topic proposal in light of a couple of complaints regarding your refusal to respond to your first topic adequately. Googling your scientists and links brought me to the conclusion that Doug Axe and Stephen Meyer were connected with The Discovery Institute. So now the mystery is beginning to clear up. You are reading and considering the information from the Intelligent Design proponents. Which in my mind is neither good nor bad. I have no axe to grind with these people, though I'm sure our scientific community within the peanut gallery here at the Forum do. Nosy as I am, I have a bit of information on them as well.
The main complaint seems to be that you never answered the questions in your first topic.

Upon review, I found that you actually were rather vague---as if you wanted to argue but did not have the ammunition to engage the mainstream science guys, as well as your Intelligent Design proponents, have attempted to do.

Personally, I have no problem with these arguments but was a bit miffed that you didn't fess up and tell us all that you were considering the arguments of the Intelligent Design community from the beginning. So here is what I am going to do. I am closing your first topic for now....you have shown no desire to do anything but try and defeat the wisdom of RAZD, dWise1, Tangle, and our usual lineup of suspects here. The problem is that you are reading the information that Doug Axe and Stephen Meyer use and making their conclusions your conclusions even though you don't yet understand both sides of the arguments thoroughly. (neither do I, but I never claim to be scientific! )

All that I ask is that everyone treats each other with respect, and I also ask that everyone not gang up on Pork n Cheese but allow him to learn your arguments against Intelligent Design while respecting his desire to learn more about it. Forum Guidelines
Lets present the arguments from The Discovery Institute and Douglas Axe and Stephen Meyer and deal with them first.

Also, as I said earlier in response to Tangle, RAZD, dWise1 and others---is that you show respect for the Discovery Institute and the scientific arguments there....refuting them if you must but doing it slowly and allowing us to understand your objections to the specific arguments.

If you all don't play nice I'm closing this thread also.

Edited by AdminPhat, : explanation

Edited by AdminPhat, : spelling

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Porkncheese, posted 12-03-2018 10:08 PM AdminPhat has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021