Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2

Kleinman:

---

You forgot to list those papers.

AZPaul3:

---

CAUTION: The listed papers above are considered to be bogus, filled with incorrect math and inappropriate conclusions.
​
The reader is advised to disregard their content as well as their author.

---

---

Even with a bigger font, you still forget to list those papers. I'll help you.
For a single selection pressure:
The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection
And for multiple simultaneous selection pressures:
The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance
If you have trouble understanding the "at least one" rule and the multiplication rule, dwise1 can explain them to you. You can use this math to model the Kishony and Lenski biological evolutionary experiments as well as explain the evolution of drug resistance and why cancer treatments fail.

Kleinman:

---

Don't forget panspermia.

Dredge:

---

Another fine example of the contributions atheist scientists have made to the field science-fiction.
​
I think someone must have watched too many episodes of Star Trek.

---

---

It is scientific training by Marvel Comics. It gives a whole new meaning to the "Web of Science".

CAUTION: The listed papers above are considered to be bogus, filled with incorrect math and inappropriate conclusions.
​
The reader is advised to disregard their content as well as their author.

Funny.Pseudo-science has provided so much entertainment, so we owe atheist scientists a great debt of gratitude.

Some discoverers of scientific and medical breakthroughs were initially considered fools and quacks.

I'm looking forward to the adventures of their new super-hero ... UCD-man. (Universal Common Descent)

Kleinman:

---

For a single selection pressure:

AZPaul3:

---

CAUTION: The listed papers above are considered to be bogus, filled with incorrect math and inappropriate conclusions.
​
The reader is advised to disregard their content as well as their author.

---

---

Try using a larger font, it might make it more convincing. Since you still don't list the papers that you are talking about, I'll help you
For a single selection pressure:
The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection
And for multiple simultaneous selection pressures:
The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance
If you have trouble understanding the "at least one" rule and the multiplication rule, dwise1 can explain them to you. You can use this math to model the Kishony and Lenski biological evolutionary experiments as well as explain the evolution of drug resistance and why cancer treatments fail.

Kleinman:

---

It is scientific training by Marvel Comics. It gives a whole new meaning to the "Web of Science".

Dredge:

---

Funny.
​
Pseudo-science has provided so much entertainment, so we owe atheist scientists a great debt of gratitude.

---

---

I don't think these people are acting. I think these people have lost contact with reality.

Kleinman:

---

It is scientific training by Marvel Comics

Dredge:

---

I'm looking forward to the adventures of their new super-hero ... UCD-man. (Universal Common Descent)

---

---

Sure, they can get an out of work Transformer to play the role. He turns into whatever the environmental conditions require.

CAUTION: The listed papers above are considered to be bogus, filled with incorrect math and inappropriate conclusions.
​
The reader is advised to disregard their content as well as their author.

Kleinman:

---

For a single selection pressure:

AZPaul3:

---

CAUTION: The listed papers above are considered to be bogus, filled with incorrect math and inappropriate conclusions.
​
The reader is advised to disregard their content as well as their author.

---

---

Do you really think a smaller font will work? Why don't you try bold face, italics, with a color change, and list the papers you are talking about.
For a single selection pressure:
The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection
And for multiple simultaneous selection pressures:
The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance
If you have trouble understanding the "at least one" rule and the multiplication rule, dwise1 can explain them to you. Even Taq with his limited training in math knows this math is correct for asexual replicators. You can use this math to model the Kishony and Lenski biological evolutionary experiments as well as explain the evolution of drug resistance and why cancer treatments fail.

CAUTION: The listed papers above are considered to be bogus, filled with incorrect math and inappropriate conclusions.
​
The reader is advised to disregard their content as well as their author.

AZPaul3:

---

CAUTION: The listed papers above are considered to be bogus, filled with incorrect math and inappropriate conclusions.
​
The reader is advised to disregard their content as well as their author.

---

Too bad that the layman AZPaul3 can't find any errors in the mathematics or conclusions. Let the readers come to their own conclusions and since AZPaul3 doesn't list the papers, here they are.
For a single selection pressure:
The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection
And for multiple simultaneous selection pressures:
The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance
If you have trouble understanding the "at least one" rule and the multiplication rule, dwise1 can explain them to you. Even Taq with his limited training in math knows this math is correct for asexual replicators. You can use this math to model the Kishony and Lenski biological evolutionary experiments as well as explain the evolution of drug resistance and why cancer treatments fail.

CAUTION: The listed papers above are considered to be bogus, filled with incorrect math and inappropriate conclusions.
​
The reader is advised to disregard their content as well as their author.

AZPaul3:

---

CAUTION: The listed papers above are considered to be bogus, filled with incorrect math and inappropriate conclusions.
​
The reader is advised to disregard their content as well as their author.

---

AZPaul3 is afraid for reader to read these papers because they burst his mathematically irrational belief system. Since he doesn't list the papers he is afraid for the reader to read, I will list them for you.
For a single selection pressure:
The basic science and mathematics of random mutation and natural selection
And for multiple simultaneous selection pressures:
The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance
If you have trouble understanding the "at least one" rule and the multiplication rule, dwise1 can explain them to you. Even Taq with his limited training in math knows this math is correct for asexual replicators. You can use this math to model the Kishony and Lenski biological evolutionary experiments as well as explain the evolution of drug resistance and why cancer treatments fail.It is strange that AZPaul3 would not want to understand the mathematical behavior of descent with modification and adaptation because this gives the correct explanation for the evolution of drug resistance and why cancer treatments fail. AZPaul3 can not deal with this reality.