Being offended.

You're not that stupid. You know nobody believes Star Wars or Star Trek. In fact, we put them on the same level with Jesus and Noah. Wrong again. Nobody wants to replace Jesus with Luke Skywalker. Do you think at all?We want to rid mankind of belief in ALL myths. You have no argument. There is no "new mythos". See above.

You should read the Bible. Almost everything you believe about "Satan" comes from Milton.

And Dante Alighieri

I was talking about science, you are talking about mathematics, what is your point?

Yes I know.

You just made his point for him.

Is there a difference? Are you really so gone dumb that you think these are separate? Math is the tool. It is the language of science. They are inseparable.And yes, 0% probability is not absolute certainty any more than 100% probability. But you have to understand math and science to understand why.I don't think you have the capacity to comprehend. You have that religious screw loose in your head that keeps you from seeing reality.

You are wrong.SYNONYMS FOR faithacceptance
belief
confidence
conviction
hope
loyalty
truth
trust
allegiance
assent
assurance
certainty
certitude
constancy
credence
credit
credulity
dependence
faithfulness
fealty
fidelity
reliance
stock
store
sureness That's your own self-serving definition.
When the best hitter on the team goes up for the winning shot and his teammates say "I have faith in you" it is solely based on reality. I don't have problems at all. I have clearly stated that there are different levels of trust and faith.One can even say the faith I put in God is the same faith people put in science. There are many people who take drugs who have no idea how the science works, or who is presenting it. That is stupidity. Russia.Men will be men. All the atheists in this forum who love to insult me, such as yourself instigate war on a daily basis. Don't feed me this bullshit. In my conversation with chat gtp it was made clear that subjective evidence IS evidence. I see lot's of things happening all the time, I can't prove them and neither can you. So your "emotions" mean as much as mine. I do not follow any specific religion, but I do believe in God and if you don't you shouldn't be starting wars. My belief in God has nothing to do with the topic. Atheist 'mega-churches' taking root across US | Fox News You don't know me, and stop pretending you do. It isn't very scientific of you. I have not intentionally offended anyone, and if you got offended it only proves my point that being taught how not to be offended has more value.Also thank you for proving my theory of demonization. You do not have the right to treat me anyway based on your subjective emotions. Your entire message 402 is nothing but subjective. you are just another hypocrite, I am sure you are proud. You don't possess the skills to debate me on the topic so you have to use liberal debate tactics to try and win some argument that has nothing to do with the topic. You don't even know how to follow forum guidelines, why should I think you know how science works, or if you understand the difference between being offended, and learning how not to be offended?Your posts do nothing to help society, you are the reason wars happen, not religion. Atheists churches are the evolution of the way men think, they inherently do not get along, and that is the reason for war. Not the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, or God. Go take a look in the mirror, it says riVeRraT.I really hope your next post will logically explain why teaching people not to be offended has more value than teaching someone how not to be offended. If you can't do that, then stay out of it please.

The rest who are probably in charge of say, health rules for the entire world, are mostly motivated by money.

This is a troublesome definition. I guess there is science, and there is the scientific method. Their biggest motivation should be to have the scientific method work properly.

Talk about a disconnect from reality. You've really gone off the deep end, haven't you. All the work you put into that screed only to pop another inanity at the end.Yes, yes, my atheist megachurch has a war council going and I have to go give numbers on how many babies we need for this years gala, Baby Fest 2023, come November.The right wing in this country is so fuckin sick.If you're offended then good. You should be. You are a prime example of how religion has poisoned the human psyche. You not only profess an asinine belief in fantasy you spread that disease in these forums.Be gone evil one.

We are way off topic.I would love to debate this, but I don't have a good understanding of it. My initial thought is if P(E)=0 both P and E would have to be zero. As soon as E has a value, then P must have a value. In other words if we dream something up like say teleportation, who is to say that one day it won't happen?Unless zero probability only represents present, and not future. If so, then it is not really applicable in determining if God exists or not.I also found this web-site, but don't understand all the math.
Zero-probability events | They are not impossibleMaybe make a separate thread about it? You are correct. Thank you for pointing that out. Yet the phrase exists, is used in science, and there is a legal definition for it. It's why I never say "God exists". I can only say I believe God exists. I also believe that God designed it that way. However, lot's of things in the bible are not subjective and can be evident to everyone.What does this have to do with learning how not to be offended?

That must be why Elon Musk took the job making the health rules for the entire world.

I remember when I started the Punic Wars. I wanted Hannibal to bring the elephants closer so I could see them better.Good times....I should have called AZPaul3. He likes elephants too. But the telephone hadn't been invented yet.

They are synonyms, I should have been more clear. The words are easily used in place of faith. I have faith in God, and on our money it says "In God We Trust", same thing. It's nit picking and goes beyond my point. Not by talking to it.Matthew 17:20 He answered them, “for assuredly, I say to you, if you have faith as a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move; and nothing will be impossible for you” By who's subjective definition? Do you have some kind of absolute definition for love? Isn't this concept at the core of this topic, and why you can never "not offend anyone"?Love for your children is 100% subjective. Yes I have. What has happened is people have twisted my words. I have no problem being put on top of that list if that's where you want to put me. The problem is the demonization of me to make anything I say wrong, and to give free rein to say anything you want to me. That is far worse that saying something stupid once and a while.