Did the Flood really happen?

If she can open a browser, try this:Error 404 (Not Found)!!1it's just the malwarebytes installer renamed.

We do. On the ocean floor. In river deltas.The Earth is covered by separate and neatly sorted layers, in some places distorted and broken by various obvious means.You obviously are speaking of a planet that exists only in your head.

It can take hours depending on how much is stored on the computer. If it's scanning it's working, but filenames should be appearing on the screen.When it finishes have it quarantine everything it finds.

It can take hours depending on how much is stored on the computer. If it's scanning it's working, but filenames should be appearing on the screen.When it finishes have it quarantine everything it finds.

It lists every file that it's looking at and the number of issues it's found. One virus can be several issues.

That's the though but not the reality. How do you know? Creatures do not usually get buried, let alone fossilized. But a very few do. You've said than many mnay times. It would be a refreshing change for you to at least try to produce some evidence and/or reasoning for this claim. [qs]Except the geological column is all built one on top of another in the same place,[/qsq]
As are the sediments being deposited today. To you "hither and yon" means "in the same place on top of previous layers? The sediments are being deposited on top of the geologic column. That's a relationship.Insofar as layers are associated with time periods, the sediments deposited today are associated with the Quaternaty period and the Holocene epoch. That's awfully vague. What is your source for your claim of "what we see"? Personal and physical observation? Collecting and inspecting samples? Reading other's investigations? Making it up out of whole cloth?It's not at all obvious what you mean by "jumbled". It's defined as "mixed up in a confused or untidy way." That's definitely not true of the sea floor and river deltas, and I fail to see how it's applicable to the land.

They are in the right place, directly at the top of the existing geologic column.Some of them have tremendously extent, such as the floor of the Pacific Ocean, covering 30% of the Earth and 15 times the area of the United States.Why can't they become rock like the other layers? Oh, I know, there's no physical reason but you don't want them to.

You seem to think that the geologic column appears only in "very definite locations". No, the geologic column is defined as:

quote:

---

1. a columnar diagram that shows the rock formations of a locality or region and that is arranged to indicate their relations to the subdivisions of geologic time.
2 : the sequence of rock formations in a geologic column.

---

(Merriam-Webster, note "a locality or region")

quote:

---

The geological column is the theoretical classification system for the layers of rocks and fossils that make up the Earth's crust (also known as the standard geologic column). Fossiliferous layers can often be traced across entire continents and correlated with rocks in other countries.

---

(CreationWiki.com, note "crust" )

quote:

---

The geologic system is a conceptual arrangement of rock formations around the world meshed together into a single, unbroken record of Earth's past.[1] It is also known as the geologic column or geologic timescale.

---

(Conservapedia, note" around the world "lDid you notice that none of those definitions restrict the location of the geologic column in any way? Every point on the crust (which encompasses all the parts that are above the mantle, including sea floors is the top of "the" geologic column. Really it's the local portion of a world-wide geologic column. The interior layers of the crust vary widely from place to place. But we can tell from context that "geologic column" really means "local geologic column.When sediment accumulates on the ocean floor, it's accumulating on top of the (local} geologic column, and adding to it. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

That's some impressive ASCII art.

Wow. I was using MINCE (MINCE Is Not Complete Emacs) on a DG mini literally 50 years ago.

The geologic column covers the entire earth, as the definitions I posted show. Drop a grain of sand anywhere on earth, including the oceans, and wherever it lands it is on top of the geologic column.Off Greenland: Mediterranean Sea: Norwegian Sea: And we are back to derogatory assertions with no analysis or discussion. What makes them pathetic and paltry other than your desire to ignore the reality?

And we are back to derogatory assertions with no analysis or discussion. What makes them pathetically inadequate?All of the cores I posted are from the ocean, two of them from the deep ocean. Where did Lake beds come in?Everyone agrees with me that the geologic column is growing in areas of net deposition.Here's a core from Arizona:

The Pacific Ocean is 15 times larger than the United States and 6.5 times larger than North America and 3.6 times larger than the Americas (North, Central, and South). The Atlantic Ocean is 2.5 times larger than the Americas. The Indian Ocean is 1.7 times larger than the Americas. All these oceans are areas of net deposition and are adding to the geologic column.Even if only 1/10 of the Pacific generates one layer it will dwarf the extent of any layers in the Midwest and in the Grand Canyon/Grand Staircase area.WTF is it with lakes? Lakes are usually areas of net deposition, they add to the geologic column, but their additions seldom have impressive extent. I'm talking about OCEANS. The subject is OCEANS. If you reply please do not use the word "lake" or any synonym. Feel free to discuss OCEANS.

It doesn't say what part of Arizona. The depth is also not specified. One needs access to the technical papers for such information. Given the ENORMOUS extent of strata in the Southwest on which you love to harp, it definitely captured one or more of those ENORMOUS strata. .The point is, ignoring color, the layering in the Arizona core is very similar to the layers in the ocean cores.Layers are being formed as I write and are adding to the geologic column. Some of them rival or exceed the ENORMOUS extent of layers in the Southwest US.

You are assuming that all the strata end at the sea level line? Really? Really? Did you notice that all of the strata are continuous above the bottom line?There's no broken off pieces in that drawing.Did you notice that all of the strata are continuous above the bottom line?There's no broken off pieces in that drawing. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.