Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,331 Year: 3,588/9,624 Month: 459/974 Week: 72/276 Day: 23/49 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did the Flood really happen?
Percy
Member
Posts: 22472
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 766 of 2370 (859120)
07-28-2019 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 742 by Faith
07-27-2019 7:47 PM


Re: once again now: the strata would originally NOT have been where the diagram has them
Faith writes:
Your own drawing...
What drawing? The one in Message 734? You know, it isn't that hard to type "[msg=734]". I'll assume Message 734.
...illustrates what I meant by "collapse:" you show the strata all in place horizontally, and then tilted so that the vertical part becomes horizontal...
I know what you're trying to say, but this is a terrible way to say it. What you mean to say is, "You show the strata all in place horizontally and stacked vertically, and then they become tilted so that the vertical stack becomes almost horizontally oriented." This is still a terrible way of saying it. What you should say is that the horizontal strata were uplifted to become nearly vertical.
Of course, it isn't true that they became nearly vertical. As you've been reminded on numerous occasions, the vertical dimension is highly exaggerated in geology diagrams. These near vertical strata are actually closer to horizontal than vertical:
/\
                                      /  \
                                     / /\ \
                                    / /  \ \
                                   / / /\ \ \
                                  / / /  \ \ \
                                 / / / /\ \ \ \
                                / / / /  \ \ \ \
                               / / / / /\ \ \ \ \
                              / / / / /  \ \ \ \ \
                             / / / / / /\ \ \ \ \ \
                            / / / / / /  \ \ \ \ \ \
                           / / / / / / /\ \ \ \ \ \ \
                          / / / / / / /  \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                         / / / / / / /    \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                        / / / / / / /      \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                       / / / / / / /        \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                      / / / / / / /          \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                     / / / / / / /            \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                    / / / / / / /              \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                   / / / / / / /                \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                  / / / / / / /                  \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                 / / / / / / /                    \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                / / / / / / /                      \ \ \ \ \ \ \
	       G F E D C B A     	            A B C D E F G
...as we see the short pieces of strata laid out along the island. They were originally vertical,...
You're back to the UK cross section again, and the way you say this is all wrong. The antecedent of "they" is "strata", so you're actually saying, "The strata were originally vertical." This is, of course, false and not what you meant. They were originally horizontal (most of them).
Stop alternating back and forth between referring to the strata (originally horizontal) and referring to the stack of strata (originally vertical). Stop talking about the orientation of stacks of strata altogether. No one discusses geology in those terms. Talk about the orientation of the strata.
...and with the rest of the strata now beneath the island it looks like it all "collapsed" to me.
"Beneath the island" is not meaningful because sea level is an artificial line of demarcation. Both sea and land levels rise and fall over time. Even in your Flood scenario sea level is not where it is now.
The tilted part in your drawing kept falling...
You mean this particular diagram in my sequence is correct? If so I'm shocked, because it shows the the strata to the left of the uplift tipping over and falling to the left, and analogously for the right, which is crazy. What mechanism are you imagining caused this tipping over to happen?
|\                                              /|
<============  | |\                                          /| |  ============>
               | | |\                                      /| | |
               | | | |\                                  /| | | |
               | | | | |\                              /| | | | |
               | | | | | |\                          /| | | | | |
               | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |
      <======  | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |  ======>
               | | | | | | |           /\           | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |          /  \          | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |         /    \         | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |        /      \        | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |       /        \       | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |      /          \      | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |     /            \     | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |    /              \    | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |   /                \   | | | | | | |
               | | | | | | |  /                  \  | | | | | | |
         <==   | | | | | | | /                    \ | | | | | | |  ==>
               | | | | | | |/                      \| | | | | | |
               F E D E C B A                        A B C D E F G
...until it was under the sea level line...
Again, "sea level line," not significant or relevant.
...with just the broken-off ends on the surface, now horizontal when originally they were vertical.
The antecedent of "they" is still "strata," so you've just said, in effect, "with just the broken-off ends of strata on the surface, now horizontal when originally the strata were vertical," which of course is not what you were trying to say. I again strongly urge you cease any mention of the orientation of stacks of strata. Speak only of the orientation of the strata themselves.
It all tilted into its current position. If you want a word other than "collapse" I'm not sure what the best choice would be.
But you referred to my diagram, which was just my guess that by "collapse" you imagined the strata tipping over. Are you saying that by "collapse" you mean that the strata tipped over as shown in my diagram?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 742 by Faith, posted 07-27-2019 7:47 PM Faith has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22472
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 767 of 2370 (859122)
07-28-2019 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 752 by Faith
07-27-2019 8:20 PM


Re: once again now: the strata would originally NOT have been where the diagram has them
Faith writes:
I misread this earlier, I thought you were illustrating the mountain because I didn't see the letters identifying the strata. Since it represents the strata then it's more or less what I had in mind, yes...
What I drew in Message 725 cannot be what you had in mind. I only drew it as a starting point so that you could give me feedback about how I should change it. The drawing is actually completely insane because it shows the entire left hand side just disappearing into thin air. I made a better attempt in Message 734.
...except that you have a vertical line at the very top for the break, but the break would have been more horizontal across the strata, and it is the upper ends that break off that end up as the short tilted strata that are arranged horizontally across the island, with the rest of the strata falling beneath the sea level line of the island where we see them as very distorted.
You're describing what you see in your own head and not anything in my diagram. Please critically examine my diagram in Message 734 and give me feedback about the differences between it and how you actually envision things. You may have done that already, I don't know, I haven't read far enough yet. Let's get an accurate diagram. Sequence of diagrams, actually.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 752 by Faith, posted 07-27-2019 8:20 PM Faith has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 768 of 2370 (859126)
07-28-2019 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 723 by Percy
07-27-2019 9:10 AM


the sky is blue because ...
Person B: The reason the sky is blue is because the atmosphere absorbs other frequencies of light, leaving only blue.
ermmm ...
... he sky is blue because the atmosphere absorbs the blue wavelengths and then re-emits them (photon in, photon out ... in random direction). It doesn't do this with other frequencies, so their light (photons) comes to us directly from the sun, not spread over the sky.
Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmericanZenDeist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 723 by Percy, posted 07-27-2019 9:10 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 769 by PaulK, posted 07-28-2019 5:28 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


(1)
Message 769 of 2370 (859127)
07-28-2019 5:28 PM
Reply to: Message 768 by RAZD
07-28-2019 5:21 PM


Re: the sky is blue because ...
You're a compromiser who lets science judge the Bible.
Obviously the sky is blue because the Earth is surrounded by water, held back by a transparent barrier (Genesis 1:6-8)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 768 by RAZD, posted 07-28-2019 5:21 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 186 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 770 of 2370 (859129)
07-28-2019 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 753 by Faith
07-27-2019 8:42 PM


Re: evidence?
and beneath the sea today is only slow and steady deposition of sediments.
.
And this is not building on the geological column but you all think that's just fine even though the geological column is a very definite thing covering very definite locations, so that since the time periods were identified in relation to it, that whole system has now come to an end and you are treating this fact as meaningless. No, it has ended, as it would have if the Flood built it, but you all go on trying to cobble together utterly unrelated situations as if they continued the column. They don't.
You seem to think that the geologic column appears only in "very definite locations". No, the geologic column is defined as:
quote:
1. a columnar diagram that shows the rock formations of a locality or region and that is arranged to indicate their relations to the subdivisions of geologic time.
2 : the sequence of rock formations in a geologic column.
(Merriam-Webster, note "a locality or region")
quote:
The geological column is the theoretical classification system for the layers of rocks and fossils that make up the Earth's crust (also known as the standard geologic column). Fossiliferous layers can often be traced across entire continents and correlated with rocks in other countries.
(CreationWiki.com, note "crust" )
quote:
The geologic system is a conceptual arrangement of rock formations around the world meshed together into a single, unbroken record of Earth's past.[1] It is also known as the geologic column or geologic timescale.
(Conservapedia, note" around the world "l
Did you notice that none of those definitions restrict the location of the geologic column in any way? Every point on the crust (which encompasses all the parts that are above the mantle, including sea floors is the top of "the" geologic column. Really it's the local portion of a world-wide geologic column. The interior layers of the crust vary widely from place to place. But we can tell from context that "geologic column" really means "local geologic column.
When sediment accumulates on the ocean floor, it's accumulating on top of the (local} geologic column, and adding to it.
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 753 by Faith, posted 07-27-2019 8:42 PM Faith has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 771 of 2370 (859130)
07-28-2019 5:48 PM
Reply to: Message 727 by Faith
07-27-2019 1:01 PM


Re: Virus and Scanning Issues
... What happened was I wanted to watch a You Tube program. A box appeared blocking a lot of the picture ...
Some public computers have filters to block certain websites so that undesirable sites cannot be accessed. You may have run into that.
FYI I use two free programs on my computer:
1. Spywareblaster -- free download HERE
You can do "manual" and periodically (example first of the month) check for updates to download and activate, or you can pay a small fee and have automatic updates. I do the manual downloads (cause I'm a cheap bastid)
If you do a lot of cruising on the internet, some webpages you visit will leave trojans to gather information about your uses/preferences. This is "malware" and they are blocked by this program. They keep adding new ones so updates are necessary.
2. Glary Registry Repair -- free download HERE
You can do a manual scan of the registry files and then repair any defects that occur. Again once a month is more than adequate. This helps the computer run smoother and faster. The registry files tell the computer where the program files are and how they are organized.
AND
And then once a year or so you should defrag your hard-drive so that it resorts the bits and pieces on the hard drive so that they are near each other. If you create and delete a lot of files the computer ends up putting them in bits and pieces where there are empty spaces on the disk. The more fragmented your disk is the slower it operates.
Happy cruising.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmericanZenDeist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 727 by Faith, posted 07-27-2019 1:01 PM Faith has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22472
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 772 of 2370 (859131)
07-28-2019 5:58 PM
Reply to: Message 753 by Faith
07-27-2019 8:42 PM


Re: evidence?
Faith writes:
What are you imagining would do the jumbling up?
The thought is that both the greatest part of the surface of the earth AND the sea floor are not discreet sediments but mixed or jumbled sediments,...
Land predominantly experiences net erosion, sea floor net deposition. You can't compare the two.
Since sediments accumulate on the sea floor at a gradual rate that averages around one or two inches per millennium, what are you imagining is happening to jumble them? Of course sea floors experience all the familiar geological events like storms and earthquakes and so on, but here and there, not everywhere.
...in which creatures do not usually manage to get themselves buried, let alone fossilized. Predators eat them and even their bones eventually decompose.
How do you know how often life gets itself buried? Seriously, tell us how you know this, because just asserting it over and over again without telling us how you figured this out is getting tiresome.
What about getting buried during an avalanche along the continental shelf. How about any creatures that happen to have recently died off the coast when a storm causes a river to dump a torrent of water with a heavy sediment load into the coastal ocean. How about dying and sinking into deep enough water to fall out of reach of predators. Or any of dozens of different scenarios.
Most sedimentary layers are marine,
Yes but the odd thing is that both the marine and the terrestrial sedimentary rocks in the geological column are clearly in FORM -- flatness, thickness, etc -- created by the same processes.
But terrestrial and marine sediments were not created by the same processes, and they do not have the appearance of being created by the same processes. Terrestrial sediments are markedly different from marine sediments. Terrestrial sediments only accumulate in low lying areas like basins and coastal regions. Dinosaur National Park was a basin 150 million years ago. Terrestrial strata were clearly deposited by lakes and rivers in floodplains or in arid areas by aeolian processes. Flat terrestrial regions are not that uncommon, as you know. Maybe this looks familiar, it's in your state, after all:
Some of the sediments are completely just one kind in both cases, all sandstone or all limestone or whatever,...
Terrestrial sandstone strata, sure, sand is common in plains and deserts. Terrestrial limestone strata, no, because the kind of life that makes up limestone strata does not live on land.
...and all have fossilized creatures contained in them, marine creatures, land creatures, both in their respective strata.
It would be very unusual and unexpected to find terrestrial life in any limestone layers, for obvious reasons.
and beneath the sea today is only slow and steady deposition of sediments.
And this is not building on the geological column but you all think that's just fine even though the geological column is a very definite thing covering very definite locations,...
The geologic column is conceptual and worldwide. There isn't anywhere in the world that the geologic column doesn't represent the sequence through time of geological formations.
...so that since the time periods were identified in relation to it,...
This is a sort of okay way of saying it, but the reality is that the geologic column delineates and identifies the time periods in a geologic context. A synonym for geologic column is geologic time scale.
...that whole system has now come to an end and you are treating this fact as meaningless. No, it has ended, as it would have if the Flood built it, but you all go on trying to cobble together utterly unrelated situations as if they continued the column. They don't.
Oh, here we go again, another pronouncement from Faith on high completely lacking in any facts, evidence, logic or reasoning.
So tell us, what ended the geologic column? Did time come to an end? When that last grain of flood sediment came to rest and completed the geologic column, where did the grain of sand that emerged from a river a few minutes later and settled next to it come to rest if not also on the geologic column?
Any life buried in today's era will be from today. Any life buried 10,000 years from now will be from that future era, not from today. This is very orderly and organized and not at all jumbled up.
Except the geological column is all built one on top of another in the same place,...
Now you're not making any sense. The geologic column was not "all built one on top of another in the same place."
It is not built on top of itself, it is a single conceptual entity, and it isn't all in the same place but worldwide.
There is only one geological column, it is conceptual, and it is worldwide. The geologic column can be superimposed upon the actual sequence of formations in any given location.
...and these situations you are describing are formed hither and yon with no relation whatever to the geological column which is what has defined all the time periods, until now for some reason.
What do you mean "until now for some reason." The geologic time scale is defined right up to the present, the Holocene. Tomorrow will still be the Holocene, as will next year and the next century. At some point they'll add another epoch after the Holocene, but that won't likely be for a while, a very long while, since the previous epoch, the Pleistocene, lasted about 2.5 million years. The Holocene only began a mere 12,000 years ago.
Where is your impression of jumbled up coming from?
The actual situation of the sedimentary mixes and jumbles we see over most of the surface of the earth, and if you HAVE to include the sea bottom, there too.
Well of course you have to include the seabeds, but where is your impression of "sedimentary mixes and jumbles" coming from? Please be specific. Use Google Image search.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 753 by Faith, posted 07-27-2019 8:42 PM Faith has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22472
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 773 of 2370 (859132)
07-28-2019 6:06 PM
Reply to: Message 754 by Minnemooseus
07-28-2019 1:22 AM


Re: Steep tilt at one locations does not mean steep tilt over a larger area
Minnemooseus writes:
Just because the Silurian strata is vertical or near vertical at that location does not mean that it is near vertical everywhere.
Sorry, I should have been more clear. In this image I was referring to the Devonian strata at the top, not the Silurian strata beneath:
In my Message 698 I was comparing this actual tilt at Siccar Point to my calculated tilt of the strata in the UK cross section of near zero. Edge commented that the inconsistencies I'd found in the cross section were likely just due to its being hand drawn and so not uniformly to scale.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 754 by Minnemooseus, posted 07-28-2019 1:22 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22472
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 774 of 2370 (859144)
07-29-2019 9:23 AM
Reply to: Message 760 by Faith
07-28-2019 12:48 PM


Re: once again now: the strata would originally NOT have been where the diagram has them
Faith writes:
OK but I want to extend it to about twice that length.
Okay, will do.
Then there's a mountain of basement rock that pushes up, yielding this:
/\
                                      /  \
                                     / /\ \
                                    / /  \ \
                                   / / /\ \ \
                                  / / /  \ \ \
                                 / / / /\ \ \ \
                                / / / /  \ \ \ \
                               / / / / /\ \ \ \ \
                              / / / / /  \ \ \ \ \
                             / / / / / /\ \ \ \ \ \
                            / / / / / /  \ \ \ \ \ \
                           / / / / / / /\ \ \ \ \ \ \
                          / / / / / / /  \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                         / / / / / / /    \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                        / / / / / / /      \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                       / / / / / / /        \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                      / / / / / / /          \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                     / / / / / / /            \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                    / / / / / / /              \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                   / / / / / / /                \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                  / / / / / / /                  \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                 / / / / / / /                    \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                / / / / / / /                      \ \ \ \ \ \ \
	       G F E D C B A     	            A B C D E F G
That looks more like the mountain itself than what is yielded.
Are you sure? Isn't this what you described, that igneous rock (granite) beneath the horizontal strata experienced uplift, pushing the strata up into this orientation. While the strata still cover the uplift, which they must at least do at the beginning, isn't this what it would look like? I'm asking, not trying to influence you, but I want to be sure that that's what you really want before I make changes.
The strata would break long before you'd get such a sharp bend at the top. Cut off the whole upper triangle and that should get closer to what I have in mind.
But (I can't believe I have to say this again) geology diagrams are greatly exaggerated in the vertical dimension. What looks like a sharp bend at the top looks like this in reality. Here I just show the actual severity of that bend at the top of the formation, not the rest of it. Note how mild it is in reality. Also keep in mind that these are character diagrams, not freehand diagrams. There are limits to what can be done with character diagrams. Intricate things are often possible but take a lot of work:

_
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
Too vertical. I'd draw them tilted out from the mountain, sort of like swept-back airplane wings. The arrows shouldn't point straight out horizontally, the strata are going to fall on a more gently vertical trajectory, or tilted perhaps is a better word, in the direction they are going to end up, on the right or east anyway.
Again, these are character diagrams. What you're requesting is much more suited to freehand. I'll do the best I can.
Well, there is no island on the left/west now so the mountain is on the far left/west rather than the middle, the strata on that side are gone, yes, and the broken ends of the strata are graded more or less from longer to shorter and are tilted toward the mountain as we see them now.
I've added more island to the west of the mountain, and I've extended the eastern portion and added arrows to it to indicate that the island extends even further to the east.
Here is the new rendition, please provide feedback.
This is the initial horizontal strata. Note the arrows on the right that indicate that the island continues further to the east:
G ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > G
F ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> F
E ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> E
D ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> D
C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> C
B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> B
A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> A
Now an igneous formation has uplifted into the horizontal strata. Note that the vertical dimension is highly exaggerated:
/\
                                        /  \
                                       / /\ \
                                      / /  \ \
                                     / / /\ \ \
                                    / / /  \ \ \
                                   / / / /\ \ \ \
                                  / / / /  \ \ \ \
                                 / / / / /\ \ \ \ \
                                / / / / /  \ \ \ \ \
                               / / / / / /\ \ \ \ \ \
                              / / / / / /  \ \ \ \ \ \
                             / / / / / / /\ \ \ \ \ \ \
                            / / / / / / /  \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                           / / / / / / /    \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                          / / / / / / /      \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                         / / / / / / /        \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                        / / / / / / /          \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                       / / / / / / /            \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                      / / / / / / /              \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                     / / / / / / /                \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                    / / / / / / /                  \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                   / / / / / / /                    \ \ \ \ \ \ \
                  / / / / / / /                      \ \ \ \ \ \ \
G ---------------- / / / / / /                        \ \ \ \ \ \ -------------------------> G
F ----------------- / / / / /                          \ \ \ \ \ --------------------------> F
E ------------------ / / / /                            \ \ \ \ ---------------------------> E
D ------------------- / / /                              \ \ \ ----------------------------> D
C -------------------- / /                                \ \ -----------------------------> C
B --------------------- /                                  \ ------------------------------> B
A ----------------------                                    -------------------------------> A
Here the strata overlying the uplifted granite has begun to tip away. I did the best I could with the arrows. Remember this is just character graphics:
|\                                              /|
          _____  | |\                                          /| |  _____
         /       | | |\                                      /| | |       \
        /        | | | |\                                  /| | | |        \
       /         | | | | |\                              /| | | | |         \
      |          | | | | | |\                          /| | | | | |          |
      |          | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |          |
      |          | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |          |
      v          | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |          v
                 | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |
                 | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |
             __  | | | | | | |                        | | | | | | |  __
            /    | | | | | | |           /\           | | | | | | |    \
           /     | | | | | | |          /  \          | | | | | | |     \
          |      | | | | | | |         /    \         | | | | | | |      |
          |      | | | | | | |        /      \        | | | | | | |      |
          v      | | | | | | |       /        \       | | | | | | |      v
                 | | | | | | |      /          \      | | | | | | |
                 | | | | | | |     /            \     | | | | | | |
                 | | | | | | |    /              \    | | | | | | |
             __  | | | | | | |   /                \   | | | | | | |  __
            /    | | | | | | |  /                  \  | | | | | | |    \
           |     | | | | | | | /                    \ | | | | | | |	|
           v     | | | | | | |/                      \| | | | | | |     v
G ---------------- / / / / / /                        \ \ \ \ \ \ -------------------------> G
F ----------------- / / / / /                          \ \ \ \ \ --------------------------> F
E ------------------ / / / /                            \ \ \ \ ---------------------------> E
D ------------------- / / /                              \ \ \ ----------------------------> D
C -------------------- / /                                \ \ -----------------------------> C
B --------------------- /                                  \ ------------------------------> B
A ----------------------                                    -------------------------------> A
Here the strata are continuing to tip away from the granite mountain:
____________                                                                      ____________
 \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                                    / / / / / / /
  \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                                  / / / / / / /
   \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                                / / / / / / /
    \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                              / / / / / / /
     \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                            / / / / / / /
    / \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                          / / / / / / / \
   /   \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                        / / / / / / /   \
   |    \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                      / / / / / / /     |
   |     \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                    / / /	/ / / /      |
   v      \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                  / / / / / / /       v
           \ \ \ \ \ \ \                                                / / / / / / /
            \ \ \ \ \ \ \                      /\                      / / / / / / /
           / \ \ \ \ \ \ \                    /  \                    / / / / / / / \
          /   \ \ \ \ \ \ \                  /    \                  / / / / / / /   \
         |     \ \ \ \ \ \ \                /      \                / / / / / / /     |
         v      \ \ \ \ \ \ \              /        \              / / / / / / /      v
                 \ \ \ \ \ \ \            /          \            / / / / / / /
                  \ \ \ \ \ \ \          /            \          / / / / / / /
                   \ \ \ \ \ \ \        /              \        / / / / / / /
	          / \ \ \ \ \ \ \      /                \      / / / / / / / \
                 |   \ \ \ \ \ \ \    /                  \    / / / / / / /   |
                 v    \ \ \ \ \ \ \  /                    \  / / / / / / /    v
		       \ \ \ \ \ \ \/                      \/ / / / / / /
      G ---------------- / / / / / /                        \ \ \ \ \ \ -------------------------> G
      F ----------------- / / / / /                          \ \ \ \ \ --------------------------> F
      E ------------------ / / / /                            \ \ \ \ ---------------------------> E
      D ------------------- / / /                              \ \ \ ----------------------------> D
      C -------------------- / /                                \ \ -----------------------------> C
      B --------------------- /                                  \ ------------------------------> B
      A ----------------------                                    -------------------------------> A
And lastly the strata has completely tipped away from the mountain. The strata that fell away to the west have fallen into the sea. The strata to the east should have fallen onto the land, but you haven't described how to represent that yet:
/\
                                              /  \
                                             /    \
                                            /      \
                                           /        \
                                          /          \
                                         /            \
                                        /              \
	                               /                \
                                      /                  \
                             /   /   /                    \   \   \
		        / / /   / / /                      \   \   \ \ \
      G ---------------- / / / / / /                        \ \ \ \ \ \ -------------------------> G
      F ----------------- / / / / /                          \ \ \ \ \ --------------------------> F
      E ------------------ / / / /                            \ \ \ \ ---------------------------> E
      D ------------------- / / /                              \ \ \ ----------------------------> D
      C -------------------- / /                                \ \ -----------------------------> C
      B --------------------- /                                  \ ------------------------------> B
      A ----------------------                                    -------------------------------> A
Please give me your feedback and I'll do another revision if necessary. If this is okay then I have some questions.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 760 by Faith, posted 07-28-2019 12:48 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 775 by JonF, posted 07-29-2019 9:33 AM Percy has replied
 Message 779 by Faith, posted 07-29-2019 12:19 PM Percy has replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 186 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 775 of 2370 (859145)
07-29-2019 9:33 AM
Reply to: Message 774 by Percy
07-29-2019 9:23 AM


Re: once again now: the strata would originally NOT have been where the diagram has them
That's some impressive ASCII art.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 774 by Percy, posted 07-29-2019 9:23 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 776 by Percy, posted 07-29-2019 9:52 AM JonF has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22472
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 776 of 2370 (859146)
07-29-2019 9:52 AM
Reply to: Message 775 by JonF
07-29-2019 9:33 AM


Re: once again now: the strata would originally NOT have been where the diagram has them
I owe it all to emacs.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 775 by JonF, posted 07-29-2019 9:33 AM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 777 by JonF, posted 07-29-2019 10:44 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 186 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 777 of 2370 (859151)
07-29-2019 10:44 AM
Reply to: Message 776 by Percy
07-29-2019 9:52 AM


Re: once again now: the strata would originally NOT have been where the diagram has them
Wow. I was using MINCE (MINCE Is Not Complete Emacs) on a DG mini literally 50 years ago.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 776 by Percy, posted 07-29-2019 9:52 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 778 by jar, posted 07-29-2019 11:22 AM JonF has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 778 of 2370 (859154)
07-29-2019 11:22 AM
Reply to: Message 777 by JonF
07-29-2019 10:44 AM


Re: once again now: the strata would originally NOT have been where the diagram has them
I was using EMACS back when it really meant EMACS Makes Every Computer Slow.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill StudiosMy Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 777 by JonF, posted 07-29-2019 10:44 AM JonF has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1462 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 779 of 2370 (859159)
07-29-2019 12:19 PM
Reply to: Message 774 by Percy
07-29-2019 9:23 AM


Re: once again now: the strata would originally NOT have been where the diagram has them
Just addressing the last figure on your diagram:
There shouldn't be any strata on the left/west of the mountain figure.
The strata to the right/east of it should not be horixontal. The broken strata should tilt upward toward the left/west, that is toward the mountain, the longer pieces first and shorter to the right/east; and should be laid out all along the sea level line as we see it on the diagram we've been looking at for so long. However we get there it has to end up looking like that diagram.
So, beneath the sea level line the tilted strata should continue a short distance as they do on that other diagram, and then bend to the right until they look like the strata on that diagram.
As for how you got there, I'll have to go back and think about it more.
ABE: Just looked again at your diagrams and they make no sense to me at all. I thought it would get clearer but it hasn't.
I just discovered there is a Paint program on this computer though my first attempt to make use of it didn't work very well so i can't promise anything.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 774 by Percy, posted 07-29-2019 9:23 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 781 by Percy, posted 07-29-2019 12:37 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1462 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 780 of 2370 (859163)
07-29-2019 12:36 PM
Reply to: Message 764 by Percy
07-28-2019 2:39 PM


Re: evidence?
Forget the sea floor. It's not located where it would have to be to continue the geo column.
Cores taken throughout the Midwest of the US all show the layers of the geo column. They extend over a vast distance beneath the surface. No sedimentary deposit today qualifies. I don't know if cores have been taken in the Grand Canyon/Grand Staircase area, but there is a vast surface of Kaibab and Coconino layers, covering the whole area, and cores should show the same strata we see in teh Grand Canyon, and we're talking probably thousands of square miles.
All the sedimentary deposits proposed to continue the geo column today are a pathetically paltry offering.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 764 by Percy, posted 07-28-2019 2:39 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 785 by Percy, posted 07-29-2019 1:05 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 789 by JonF, posted 07-29-2019 1:34 PM Faith has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024