Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 57 (9054 total)
66 online now:
Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), nwr (2 members, 64 visitors)
Newest Member: EWolf
Post Volume: Total: 888,326 Year: 5,972/14,102 Month: 120/438 Week: 52/112 Day: 7/8 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Biased accounts of intelligent design
Capt Stormfield
Member
Posts: 424
From: Vancouver Island
Joined: 01-17-2009


Message 145 of 146 (881991)
09-07-2020 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by Jedothek
08-26-2020 8:38 PM


Re: Geting back to the question of ID
But when atheists see indications of intelligent design, they react irrationally because they fear that the evidence will lead them to believe in a superhuman designer, often supposed to be God.

A couple points.

- There is no evidence of intelligent design. The arguments for the proposition are theological and/or logically fallacious in nature.

- Opponents of intelligent design react negatively to it because its promoters were stupid enough to publish an outline of their goals and methods. Have you read the wedge document? Do you understand the problems associated with outlining a plan for the integration of your hypothesis into society broadly, and education specifically, which plan places "find evidence for hypothesis" after its implementation in said plan?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by Jedothek, posted 08-26-2020 8:38 PM Jedothek has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by FLRW, posted 09-08-2020 5:36 PM Capt Stormfield has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021