Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 69 (9033 total)
57 online now:
Coragyps, Mercury, PaulK, ringo, Tangle, xongsmith (6 members, 51 visitors)
Newest Member: robertleva
Post Volume: Total: 885,054 Year: 2,700/14,102 Month: 365/703 Week: 18/168 Day: 18/21 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why is it ALL MOSTLY mammals above the dinosaurs?
Tangle
Member
Posts: 8121
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 10 of 56 (865910)
11-02-2019 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Faith
11-02-2019 6:34 AM


Faith writes:

I guess I'm going to have to try to research it all because it seems to me there should be a lot more of the "earlier" forms in each time period than are found.

Your original claim was disproven immediately.

“I really have only one point to make: Why are there ONLY mammals in that find?”

So now you're moving the goal posts. But how on earth are you going to show that there should be more? How many would be enough? Why should they all be found there?


Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.I am Finland. Soy Barcelona

"Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Faith, posted 11-02-2019 6:34 AM Faith has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Faith, posted 11-02-2019 12:23 PM Tangle has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021