jar writes:
Our brilliant Lt Gov wants to end social separation and let everybody just get back to work.
I do not have the answer - but saying this is not part of the solution is just as silly as saying the government should shut everything down for months-on-end.
The government certainly can "shut everything down."
But they cannot control people.
Those who rent will likely get hit hardest, first.
These people are also likely to already be living paycheck-to-paycheck.
Remove that paycheck, and what do you have?
A very large portion of people relying on social systems from the government to get money to cover expenses to feed their families.
Have you ever heard of a large scale government system that worked well?
What about one that's being forced to kick it into high gear in a matter of days?
The logistics for being able to help all those who need it as required - is not going to work out.
Projects have the "shutdown" lasting until when - end of summer? 4-5 months from now?
Then what? Everyone comes back out and the virus begins to spread again anyway?
Economic projections say the population can only "hold on" under a shutdown for 1-2 months max.
Then people will be starving and unable to get money to feed their families.
What's worse? Dying of the virus or dying from no food?
Again - I'm not saying I have an answer (it's very complicated.)
But to imply that an extended shutdown will solve everything is just as silly as this guy saying everyone going to back to work right now will fix everything.
There needs to be some practical analysis and some give-and-take on both sides of the issue.
Both sides end in deaths-that-can-be-prevented.
But the prevention methods for one side make the other worse (and vice versa.)
So... what to do?
Some sort of compromise has to happen.
The economy has to function at some level.
While their also has to be some level of gathering-restrictions.
But "extended total shutdown" isn't going to work.
Just as much as "no gathering restrictions at all."