1. You don't define evolution, ...
... I basically take it to be macro-evolution. The usual definition.
Wrong one both accounts, but okay
for the purpose of discussion: now define macro-evolution and give what you think is the usual definition (usual to whom? Scientists or Creationists?)
I give a full explanation that abiogenesis ONLY HAS RELEVANCE TO EVOLUTION THEORY. ...
Irrelevant then to a book on evolution your book is about abiogenesis and not evolution.
As Tangle points out evolution only occurs after there is life to evolve. At this point it doesn’t matter how life started for us to study how it has evolved since that point.
We know for a fact that life exists, so we can take that as a starting point to study how life evolves.
Enjoy