Yeah, it's easy to see where you're going. You're going to declare that (1) information is immaterial, and (2) that it is therefore out of reach of "naturalism".
But the thing is, Richard, scientists do in fact believe in, record, and study, the information in DNA. (They also believe that there's information in a dictionary, or a gif of a kitten if they come to that.) So if we grant you those two things, it will be necessary for you to concede that scientists are not naturalists, since they believe in a supernatural entity (the information in DNA) and, indeed, know a lot more about the supernatural than you do.
You're building an impossible triangle here, something's got to give.