The Biden Presidency

thanks for confirming that every time trump shits himself in rage over what the media reports it's because it's true.

Happy birthday!--Percy

Thank you.

Good job, Biden!You and your party have just done a smashing job, with your great credibility & sincerity, as you boldly grip the heart of the nation - marching us forward.Real leadership in action.Just look at those results!Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.

You still can't make trump look any better.

Oh lookie, somebody stepped on the squeakie toy.

Kill all anti-vaxers!Yeaaaaaaaaa!

He was a Democrat you know!

No. No catch. I keep a social distance and wear a mask. I'm trying not to catch anything.

Unfortunately for you , Judicial watch is not a very valid source of information. Edited by ramoss, : No reason given.

Wouldn't Marc just answer that that's just the lying liberal media throwing mud at Judicial Watch because it's constantly embarrassing them by revealing their lies? Marc chooses his own "facts" and so is able to reach any conclusion he likes.--Percy

I have not followed it much.I know that libertarians, as well as non partisan progressives eventually went sour with Obama.Jesse Ventura went sour.James Bamford went sour.I suspect that the THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING CRAZY CRAP is what caused the non partisan conservatives/libertarian groups to be set fundamentally at odds with the Democrats.Back in my 9th grade years, I was able to attend a school that was really really good ( The school cost over $50,000 to attend during the first decade of this century, but I attended when it was much cheaper a few decades earlier, or a decade and a half).The history teacher was a non partisan semi-progressive (He was not a Clinton fan at as all during the primaries), and he was a registered Democrat. His whole classroom, as well as house, looked like a library with 10 foot high shelves. He was relieved we "no longer had to hear about the Russian 'threat' ".I kept warning the class that we would have all sorts of 'threats' presented to us (I was almost prophetic about the CIA & FBI plots/lies against "people from North Africa and the Middle East"), and he would just scream (to the extent that a mild mannered 60 year old could) when I warned about a phoney "Russian threat" making a comeback in decades.He was sarcastically cynical about so much, that he just looked like an old, fat, bald, tired dead man walking - and he was. But I wonder if he is alive to see what miserable Russian conspiracies we all are supposed to swallow now?Those who do not learn from the past are destined to...(I suspect Judicial Watch is attacked by the moderate Democratic establishment over the skeptical position taken with regards to the "Russian threat", right?)Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.

No link? Are you afraid to have me check the bias of YOUR source?

Sheesh, I try to leave you folks alone for awhile in your little fantasy world, and my name keeps coming up, it's almost like I live rent free in several heads here. But it opens the door for some temporary fun.All news is biased, there was probably some stoic, unbiased news reporting done in the early days of television and radio, but it didn't take long for them to realize that there's not near as much money and ratings in that as there is in sensationalism and political bias, in either direction. News bias started out liberal in the late 60's and beyond, because the controversy it created by bucking tradition created the ratings that that era's news media was looking for. By the late 80's on, that created the market for Rush Limbaugh, Fox news etc, and they took things the other way. Instead of trying to correct themselves, the mainstream media doubled down with their bias. I remember in the late 80's CNN's "Headline News", while somewhat biased, was actually an okay source for some basic information. They showed very little hatred for Reagan or Bush 41, they had no reporters anything like Jim Acosta back then.But all this has created the mess we have today. No way for there to be agreement among the two "sides" as to whose fault it is.So your assessment of my "answer" is slightly warm, but not really too close. News is all biased, the biggest bias they all show is the omission of most (but not all) news that's not favorable to the political party they're beholden to. The best way to find out what's going on is for a person to get news from multiple sources, and use common sense to determine what seems most believable. I missed ABC World News Tonight this evening, and Thursday evening, so I can't be sure, but I'm reasonably sure that both of those nights, like the other nights when I did watch, that they have not a word to say about the 3000 + caravan of illegals in Mexico marching towards the U.S. southern border right now. Fox News covers it of course, just today one of the reporters there asked one of them, "why come now, why now?" "Because the time is right, because of Joe Biden", as marchers around him proudly wear Biden t-shirts. When it hits the border and it's big news for the conservative news sources, the mainstream will be forced to give it very limited coverage. The way many of them will be bused and flown to different parts of the U.S. will continue to be covered up.But back to Judicial Watch, this is from your Message 209; Your long link showed tons of travel by Hunter Biden. Specifically, what did I (and Judicial Watch) mis-represent?

Get used to it - you've become the poster boy for irrationality.--Percy