Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 60 (9057 total)
31 online now:
AZPaul3, DrJones*, dwise1, PaulK (4 members, 27 visitors)
Newest Member: drlove
Post Volume: Total: 889,662 Year: 774/6,534 Month: 774/682 Week: 9/445 Day: 9/14 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   There are easy creationist answers to problems evolutionists pose
FLRW
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 10-08-2007


Message 35 of 111 (885263)
03-30-2021 4:23 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
03-28-2021 8:14 AM


Interesting comment by Tolstoy. His understanding of Christianity was not without problems. He may have been right in drawing attention to a neglected dimension of the Bible, but his interpretation of the metaphysics behind it remains unacceptable to many Christians today. Why? Because in his urge to purge what he saw as a corrupted version of Jesus’ teaching, Tolstoy imposed a very rationalistic approach to Christianity, one that does away with all mysteries, rituals or traditions.

In his search for the meaning of life, Tolstoy’s only torch was the light of nineteenth-century reason. If he was won over by Jesus’ message, it was because he came to believe that Jesus was simply the most rational but human teacher ever to have walked the planet – not some incredible ‘son of God’ whose body was resurrected and actually flew back into heaven. Tolstoy believed that traditional mysteries such as Jesus’ divinity, Mary’s virginity, miracles and resurrections were either total nonsense or could be rationalised away.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 03-28-2021 8:14 AM mike the wiz has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Phat, posted 04-10-2021 11:55 AM FLRW has not yet responded

  
FLRW
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 10-08-2007


Message 36 of 111 (885264)
03-30-2021 6:01 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by mike the wiz
03-28-2021 7:48 PM


Claim:
Known processes to remove sodium from the oceans account for only 27 percent of the sodium that is added. Given the accumulation of sodium this implies, the oceans could not be more than 62 million years old.
Source:
Austin, S. A. and D. R. Humphreys, 1990. The sea's missing salt: A dilemma for evolutionists. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Creationism, Pittsburgh, 2: 17-33. The Sea's Missing Salt: A Dilemma For Evolutionists
Response:
Austin and Humphreys greatly underestimate the amount of sodium lost in the alteration of basalt. They omit sodium lost in the formation of diatomaceous earth, and they omit numerous others mechanisms which are minor individually but collectively account for a significant fraction of salt.

A detailed analysis of sodium shows that 35.6 x 1010 kg/yr come into the ocean, and 38.1 x 1010 kg/yr are removed (Morton 1996). Within measurement error, the amount of sodium added matches the amount removed.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by mike the wiz, posted 03-28-2021 7:48 PM mike the wiz has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by dwise1, posted 03-30-2021 10:48 PM FLRW has not yet responded
 Message 38 by dwise1, posted 03-31-2021 11:16 AM FLRW has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022