An Ether-Based Creation Model

quote:

---

I have been doing cryptographic research into a putatively-otherworldly set of codes in a historical Document (The Declaration of Independence), which I claim outlines "inside" but valid basic information needed to derive such a wide-ranging, yet consistently logical, cosmic model.

---

Phat??????????????????????????????

Have you absolutely no sense of discernment?

Phat writes: You would simply see him as an opportunity to flaunt your ego and tell him how ridiculous his theories are. And what good does that do anyone?

No Phat, I would do just as I have in this thread and simply ignored him.

It is YOU that I expected to have more sense.

... that so many people in the US are so totally incapable of thinking. We are in really bad shape as long as there is a large percentage of the citizenry that don't immediately break out in hysterical laughter whenever something like the absurdity that is the OP in this thread or any of the marketing of the Christian Biblical Apologists or that can even consider voting for a total con man & womanizer & utter total complete failure like Donald Trump or Greg Abbott or Ken Paxton.

Honestly, I see little hope of the US not becoming a total Fascist Autocracy withing a decade or two at the most.

Flaws can be permanent or temporary. The flaw in this case is simply never learning how to think and fortunately that can be treated and temporary.

The problem is that so many US Citizens simply refuse to put in the effort needed to learn how to think.

It's a flaw by desire.

Phat writes: Until then, I will think the way I think without worrying how to convince you.

Not true Phat.

You and so many others either choose not to think or refuse to learn how to think.

It's not political but pitiful.

Phat writes: Perhaps you can share your profession, what education you have had, and what it was that led you to an interest in this Creation Model of yours.

There you go waning SOURCE info again Phat. Someones profession or education are pretty much irrelevant when the CONTENT is simply word-salad.

Look at the CONTENT Phat. Throw source away.

Michael MD posted nothing but utterly stupid word salad that could only interest those who have never learned how to think. Not only was there no substance there was no indication that Michael MD had a clue what most of the terms he attempted to use even mean.

No wonder you fall for the nonsense the apologists try to sell, you cannot read or listen to what is actually said.

Edited by jar, : fix sub-title

MM writes: Trying this interdisciplinary, wide-ranging, kind of model in a forum like EvC seemed the likeliest way to go, with the kind of model I have.

You have no model. You don't even seem to understand what the word means in relation to a scientific model.

And the next post you made is nothing but word salad.

quote:

---

By "selectively etheric field" I meant producing a "forced," or sort of artificial, field, by intensifying the proportion of etheric components, using specific resonators, in an area where ambient rarified units exist naturally as a normal combination, or mixture, of quantum and etheric components. Such a naturally-occurring mixture of units, in my Model, would range from elemental ether units at the smallest scale, through somewhat larger "etheroidal" units, on up to quantum scale units. -You would not aim to produce an exclusively-etheric field, but rather to produce one that has a significantly higher degree of etheric components than would otherwise occur.
I'm sorry but I could not go into specific details more than this over the Internet.

---

That is truly incomprehensible babbling.

Edited by jar, : address the OPs next message as well.

When you point out to a child that they are simply babbling it is a call for them to grow up and learn to speak coherently.

I honestly believe that might even be possible for Michael MD to accomplish even though all the evidence shows otherwise.

Michael MD writes: The way my ether model would address this effect would be that if one focuses synchronized sound waves upon an ordinary object, you produce a state of increased energic motion upon the molecules and atoms of the object, an effect that can, when intensified by sufficient amplification/synchronization, "filter down" to yet-smaller components of the object, which are more etheric. (In my model, etheric components involved in producing the etheric effect of levitation would not involve the elemental ether units inside the object, but rather, "intermediate," already-partially quantized, "etheroidal" units, which are still dynamically within the vibrational dynamic of the ether, but are also "nearly quantal" and in a partially-energized state. By intensifying the internal energy-state of the internal units the object is composed of, using the sound waves, the overall density of the object becomes more etheric and levitates.

You have no model so stop claiming you do. All you have is sophomoric playground babble. Your spiel is truly embarrassing.

Edited by jar, : s + o == so

Yesterday, upon the stair,
I saw an Ether that wasn't there
It wasn't there again today
I wish, I wish it would go away...

LOL

So list those resources and the method, process, procedure, steps that would be required and explain exactly what the results would show and how those results could be tested and verified.

Maybe if at least one single post from you contained something more than word salad your idea would rise above the joke threshold.

You can't give the details of the field test over the Internet because there are no details.

You have absolutely nothing and everyone except you can see that you really aren't wearing any clothes.

A very low cost white on white t-shirt.

Please stop insulting Science Fiction and Fantasy.