Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
641 online now:
PaulK, Percy (Admin), Phat (3 members, 638 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 893,990 Year: 5,102/6,534 Month: 522/794 Week: 13/135 Day: 13/19 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   More Trumper Inanity
LamarkNewAge 
Suspended Member (Idle past 7 days)
Posts: 2236
Joined: 12-22-2015


(1)
Message 32 of 79 (889027)
10-31-2021 12:31 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by marc9000
10-30-2021 10:25 PM


Hey I just saw my name!
I have not been following this thread. I have no clue what Percy just said ( I typically know exactly what he is trying to do, but I have to confess that he can FINALLY brag about my misunderstanding. It isn't bragging unless it is true).

I never knew Judicial Watch was mentioned here, either, until few hours ago.

I just find this site uninspired these days.

I remember when I used to debate people with real spirit.

My greatest moment ever (online) was when I got Howard Dean's online campaign maestro, Jerome Armstrong, to admit that there was strong evidence for a CIA hand in the 9/11 attacks. I dared him to post it on his MYDD blog. He said, in email, he was not afraid.

So he went and posted that he does not buy the official 9/11 story, for the whole world to see. He referenced the French intelligence showing the July 4-14 meeting in Dubai.

Right after that, Dean, on Diane Rheim, said he was intrigued by the idea that Bush got intel from the Saudis, but allowed the attack to happen.

I was so proud of myself!

(THE Daily Kos founder used to refer to Armstrong as his blogfather)

I used to debate men with character.

(And I bet polling would show that less than 50% buy the official 9/11 government story, in 2021. It was around 50/50 in a 2007 Rasmussen poll)

I like the bold ones better than the partisan mush we have here.

Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.

Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.

Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by marc9000, posted 10-30-2021 10:25 PM marc9000 has taken no action

  
LamarkNewAge 
Suspended Member (Idle past 7 days)
Posts: 2236
Joined: 12-22-2015


Message 34 of 79 (889029)
10-31-2021 12:38 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Percy
10-31-2021 12:32 AM


Re: What does the evidence show?
Nobody follows your partisan blather, Percy.

I have little interest in your attention.

Sorry.

(I would have been honored years ago)

I respect your site, and intelligence. I also like alot of your effort.

You are just too cookie-cutter. It is not going to click.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Percy, posted 10-31-2021 12:32 AM Percy has seen this message

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by ringo, posted 10-31-2021 2:32 PM LamarkNewAge has taken no action

  
LamarkNewAge 
Suspended Member (Idle past 7 days)
Posts: 2236
Joined: 12-22-2015


Message 49 of 79 (889071)
11-01-2021 10:06 AM


Perhaps the 2 debating sides could examine a single issue - one at a time
Take the time to look at details, which would include:

Different proposals.

What level of support each proposal has

Costs (per year, per decade)

Regulations (How widespread will the regulations be)

(Take one issue at a time)


  
LamarkNewAge 
Suspended Member (Idle past 7 days)
Posts: 2236
Joined: 12-22-2015


Message 68 of 79 (889110)
11-03-2021 12:01 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by AZPaul3
11-02-2021 10:34 PM


Re: Is a rational discussion possible with some people?
Kick his butt with actual issues.

Have an issue discussion.

I literally have never followed ANY discussion about ( whatever this is,) this Mark9000 stuff, perhaps because of the noise interference.

(I remember little of substance)

Mark9000 is trying to tee up an issue debate.

What is stopping his opponents?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by AZPaul3, posted 11-02-2021 10:34 PM AZPaul3 has taken no action

  
LamarkNewAge 
Suspended Member (Idle past 7 days)
Posts: 2236
Joined: 12-22-2015


Message 69 of 79 (889111)
11-03-2021 12:13 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by AZPaul3
11-02-2021 6:35 PM


Re: Who's on First
Don't invoke the Nazi regime.

You would be quick to try another tactic if a room full of Jewish men would be ready to literally pound your face to an unrecognized identity.

You would be screaming for some other (sleezely selected, by you) ethnic group to have sympathy for you. (Thwy would despise you just as much)

Stop your crap.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by AZPaul3, posted 11-02-2021 6:35 PM AZPaul3 has taken no action

  
LamarkNewAge 
Suspended Member (Idle past 7 days)
Posts: 2236
Joined: 12-22-2015


Message 72 of 79 (889141)
11-07-2021 12:49 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by Percy
11-06-2021 8:48 AM


Re: The Trump Playbook All Over Again
What have Democrats done to allow a binding Puerto Rican vote on statehood?

What have they done to allow Washington DC, to do the same?

(The latter is very charged, and would require filibuster removal)

What good is it to have Democrats in charge of all 3 bodies ( House, Senate, White House)?

I bet Rippert Murdoch is personally in favor of Puerto Rican statehood. He is the most outspoken supporter of open borders that I have ever seen. I am sure you have some strawman comment on "Republican talking points", right?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Percy, posted 11-06-2021 8:48 AM Percy has seen this message

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by AZPaul3, posted 11-07-2021 1:26 PM LamarkNewAge has replied
 Message 77 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-07-2021 2:31 PM LamarkNewAge has taken no action

  
LamarkNewAge 
Suspended Member (Idle past 7 days)
Posts: 2236
Joined: 12-22-2015


Message 74 of 79 (889146)
11-07-2021 2:23 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by AZPaul3
11-07-2021 1:26 PM


Re: The Trump Playbook All Over Again
D.C. statehood was a burning issue, from 2009 to 2011, when Obama had the votes.

So you will just say, "it was a fringe issue nobody cared about", but it shows your out of touch persona.

You represent the views of an old, arrogant, white grass pole.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by AZPaul3, posted 11-07-2021 1:26 PM AZPaul3 has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022