|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,478 Year: 3,735/9,624 Month: 606/974 Week: 219/276 Day: 59/34 Hour: 2/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Religious Liberty Quiz | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
I started out to answer the items individually but it's a waste of time.
The bulk answer is: You have a right to practice your religion. You do NOT have a right to impinge on anybody else's rights. When I'm at the mall, I have a right not to hear you blathering.
25) There should be a religious right to practice ritual cannibalism.
Somebody may be pulling your leg."I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
In Canada, Sikhs, etc. in the Army have the right to wear their religious headgear, apparently even in combat roles. Our former Defense Minister, Harjit Sajjan, was an Army Colonel.
2) Service personnel on military bases should be permitted religiously mandated headwear regardless of uniform dress codes. Yes, but only during Chapel. Military responsibilities and protocols over ride religious rights. Phat writes:
But religious organizations already have tax-exemption rights. Why should they be able to take funds out when they don't put them in?
18) Religious organizations should have the same right to apply for government funding that secular organizations have. YES. Phat writes:
That's an odd question. How much demand is there for "a religious right to obtain an abortion"? And making rape an exception has always bothered me. Why does it make a difference?
19) Women should have a religious right to obtain an abortion regardless of government restrictions. As long as they pay for it...unless they were raped. Phat writes:
Apparently you're unaware of the last few hundred years of history. "Whose land it legally is" is very much in dispute. 20) Indigenous peoples should have a religious right to refuse infrastructure construction on land they deem sacred. depends whose land it legally is."I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
Yes. EVERYBODY has the right to veto the Great Commission. That's the "free will" that you keep touting.
...when one guy is offended on the public mall, he alone has the right to veto the Great Commission? Phat writes:
I, for one liberal, do not want to cancel out anybody. I INVITE you to blather your nonsense (here, where it's appropriate). I DO NOT want to silence you. I just want to point out how stupid your ideas are. This whole cancel culture narrative is a liberal attempt to control what is said and heard."I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
Same reason why you would crucify Jesus if He was alive today - you don't like His message.
jar writes: If you offend thy neighbor you are doing it wrong. Well if true, why was Jesus crucified? Phat writes:
And He offends you, which is why you deny Him and make up a right-wing substitute. He obviously offended somebody."I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
Liberal mandates would feed you, shelter you, clothe you - regardless of how you got into that condition. Let's say that I lived on "land" belonging to some long-forgotten tribe and that by law it was taken from me and I became a desperate homeless old man who likely would die on the street? Perhaps out of a drug-addicted and brain-addled old mind I even began to steal from grocery stores for sheer survival. So what have your liberal mandates regarding honor and reparations then done for me?"I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
Rob the poor to suit the rich.
At least the conservatives want to support the middle class... Phat writes:
Nobody but you is talking about " wrecking the middle class". Helping the poor will benefit everybody.
... instead of wrecking them... Phat writes:
Appeasement? You manage to make everything sound bad. ... in order to appease and help the poor."I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
It isn't that I "fail to understand". I flat-out deny it. It's a bloody lie that the rich tell you while they're stealing your eyeballs.
What ringo either fails to understand or doesnt care about is that the working middle class are stuck with the added burden of lifting up the poor. Phat writes:
Who's this "us"? YOU are the only one here complaining about a "burden". Practically everybody here is as middle class as you and they're all trying to tell you that you're being deceived by the right wing.
It seems unfair for us to bear this burden and does not help us. Phat writes:
It isn't about "applause". It's about heaven and hell. Granted Jesus may applaud us giving it all up... I think I have mentioned this before: My father used to say that we make our own heaven and hell on earth. You're content with making life hell for the poor.
quote: Phat writes:
Think of the money you would save on welfare. Think of the money you would save on policing. Think of the money you would save on addiction programs. ... but making the middle class poorer does NOT help everybody. Helping the poor is an investment, not a burden."I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
You unionized workers at Safeway are already making more than the workers doing the same job at non-unionized stores. And they're making more than the people who can't get a decent job or a decent place to live. And yet, you claim to "need" a cost-of-living increase. Why should people care about your livelihood when it's already so much better than their own?
Every time a cartful of boostable products go out our doors I see less chance of a needed cost of living increase for the workers. And i cant help being irritated by the shoplifters...they could care less about employee livlihood. Phat writes:
It can be improved through funding. This bothers me and is not simply a political issue that can be fixed through funding!"I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
Well, those are the ones we've been talking about. You seem to be just as outraged at them.
We also have smaller time thieves. They roll one cart out and roll it down the street to the bus stop. They are likely the poor disenfranchised masses that tug at your humanistic heartstrings. Phat writes:
I hope your union isn't stupid enough to think that more guns will make you safer. If they are, and if you have have half a brain, you'll tell your union to stop that lobbying. The union has lobbied for armed security as a safety issue but so far no results."I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
And yet you've mentioned it twice.
We have no position on armed or not. Phat writes:
Why not stop the evil at its source?
We just want the authority present to stop the evil that abounds. Phat writes:
As I said before, the drugstore where I worked reduced their response to shoplifters:
As the shoplifters become more brazen we fear for our security personally.1. to reduce the risk to the staff confronting them. 2. to reduce the backlash from charges of racism, etc. "I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
It doesn't work for the thousands of homeless and hungry. It doesn't seem to work very well for you either, judging by your constant complaints.
socialist ringo writes:
Because that's how America works. Why should people care about your livelihood when it's already so much better than their own? Phat writes:
I didn't suggest any such thing. I said that since you make more than many other people - including people doing the same job as you - you have less to complain about than they do.
We don't strive for everyone to be making the same wage. Phat writes:
If you had a clue what socialism is, I'd take that as a compliment. Your Socialism is showing again!"I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024