PaulK
Member Posts: 17825 Joined: 01-10-2003 Member Rating: 2.2
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
Message 72 of 81 (892198)
03-02-2022 10:34 AM
|
Reply to: Message 69 by Percy
03-02-2022 9:59 AM
|
|
Re: Proof That SARS-CoV-2 Was Produced in a Lab
Looking at the SBM article (please fix the link) they raise the obvious point that the probability is meaningless. How many sequences did they look at to find that 19-base match ? It’s just cherry picking to point out the one match they found without providing that information.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 69 by Percy, posted 03-02-2022 9:59 AM | | Percy has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 74 by Percy, posted 03-02-2022 11:03 AM | | PaulK has replied |
|
PaulK
Member Posts: 17825 Joined: 01-10-2003 Member Rating: 2.2
|
|
|
Message 75 of 81 (892206)
03-02-2022 11:25 AM
|
Reply to: Message 74 by Percy
03-02-2022 11:03 AM
|
|
Re: Proof That SARS-CoV-2 Was Produced in a Lab
The furin cleavage site is important, but the matching sequence doesn’t seem to be. The ideas on how they might be related seem to be highly speculative - maybe even clutching at straws. I can’t be certain just how bad it is, but I’d want something a lot more substantial for a match that small.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 74 by Percy, posted 03-02-2022 11:03 AM | | Percy has seen this message but not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 76 by Theodoric, posted 03-02-2022 11:32 AM | | PaulK has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2