The Power of the New Intelligent Design...

... as opposed to the Darwinist version: "We don't know, therefore billions of years done it."

Thread = ID
477 Some things will be forever unknowable - such as the process that produced the profound changes in life-forms evident in the fossil record ... in which case, your "We don't know, so let's find out" motto doesn't apply.Unfortunately, what evolutionary "science" does in that case is adopt a couple of other mottos:
1. "We don't know, so let's concoct imaginative stories about what might have happened and pretend they represent legitimate science."
2. "We don't know - the mysterious magic of billions of years done it."

If you ask me, the explanatory power of the theory of evolution is seriously overrated. For example, no Darwinist has ever offered me a sensible explanation for how venomous snakes evolved.How did their hollow fangs evolve? How did their poison glands evolve? How did the connection between their hollow fangs and their poison glands evolve?How did those snakes survive while the aforementioned system was evolving? Why did that system need to evolve at all, since the snakes had been surviving without it?

That is your best explanation of how venomous snakes evolved? What a pathetic cop-out.

Darwinists don't have to explain anything - they just make up stories. Whoever comes up with the best story, wins. That article is a pathetic joke ... credulous atheist fools clutching at straws. It's not my fault that the theory of evolution is a simplistic nineteenth century idea that is hopelessly inadequate, and that Darwinists are too blind and stupid to see it. I've noticed that you call every creationist on this site a "troll". At least you're being consistent ...

No, it's not funny at all ... it's actually quite sad that otherwise intelligent people accept a scientific theory as dubious as ToE.

Well, until their research provides a sensible explanation of how venomous snakes evolved, for example, I will continue to consider ToE to be inadequate. Oh, you mean like the pattern evident in the Cambrian explosion, for example ... dozens of novel Phyla appearing relatively suddenly without any evidence of evolutionary ancestors?
LOL!! What Darwinists ignore is what ToE doesn't explain.

They will when I win a Nobel Prize.

Trying to explain the miracle of creation using science certainly is stupid. The result of that Fool's Errand will be a scientific theory that is hopelessly inadequate ... welcome to ToE and the mad, mad world of Darwinism.

518 You forgot to mention that worshippers of evolution can't be trusted to tell the truth - they're con-artists and the snake-oil merchants of the scientific community.

The theory of evolution is a mendacious abuse of science and its aim is to deceive as many suckers as possible into believing that life on earth is the result of a known natural process and is not the miraculous work of a divine Creator (aka God).In other words, ToE is a demonic invention based on fantasy and lies. Ironically, the principal purveyors of ToE are atheists, who don't believe demons exist. Nevertheless, Satan uses these clueless atheist pawns to spread and promote his lies and nonsense.

What? You're comparing forensic science to the theory of evolution?

That sounds funny coming from someone who thinks it's scientific to believe that lifeless mud turned into human beings.

Spoken like a true atheist. Well done.

Comparing astronomy to the ToE is stupidly disingenuous ... and so typically Darwinoid.