Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
538 online now:
Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), nwr (2 members, 536 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,046 Year: 5,158/6,534 Month: 1/577 Week: 69/135 Day: 0/1 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   IRS Computers
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5112
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 4 of 16 (893747)
04-19-2022 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Tanypteryx
04-19-2022 12:54 PM


My first reaction would be that COBOL would run better on COBOL-grade systems.

Snarkiness aside, there is some truth to that remark. Our school computer in the late 70's was an IBM S/370 mainframe. It used data types that I have not seen anywhere else, like packed decimal which was handled by the CPU's instruction set. If the IRS' COBOL programs used something like packed decimal and newer computers don't support packed decimal, then the tried-and-true legacy software would not work. Therefore, they needed to keep the old computers running.

At work (embedded engineering), we had many utilities and other software tools that no longer work because 64-bit Windows no longer supports 16-bit applications. Our solution was to keep Windows XP, but then we migrated to setting up virtual computer emulators to run on our new computers.

Similarly, I wrote my program for calculating the probabilities of my MONKEY in Turbo Pascal whose extended REAL data type I used. Now I cannot find support for that extended REAL data type, so I cannot run that program with anywhere close to the same precision. I would need to set up a legacy system with legacy software.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-19-2022 12:54 PM Tanypteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-19-2022 3:12 PM dwise1 has taken no action

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5112
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 10 of 16 (893767)
04-19-2022 4:39 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Tanypteryx
04-19-2022 12:54 PM


The computers is only part of the story. The other part is reduced staffing.

One reason for reduced IRS staffing is the pandemic and the need to provide IRS agents proper social distancing. In order to provide that, the IRS simply had fewer agents working in the same office space. And trying to do the same amount of work as a larger staff used to. Which they couldn't.

Last year I had to get a tax number for our parents' trust. What should have taken only a couple of weeks ended up taking nearly two months. When I was finally able to get through to a person (that journey alone can yield hours of woeful tales), she told me that the reason it was taking so long was understaffing and that the understaffing was due to COVID social distancing requirements.

The other reason is that the Trump Administration cut the IRS' budget. Part of the reason for that was to hamstring their ability to do their work, which included investigating tax fraud (AKA auditing) and collecting on overdue taxes, etc. That was also part of Trump's hollowing out of government agencies in order to destroy them (and their ability to enforce regulations), which makes the next part all the more interesting. At the same time that Trump wasn't making any permanent appointments but rather all agencies, including DoD, were being headed by acting directors, Trump made very sure to appoint his flunkies to the top three positions at the IRS; not acting heads, but rather actual appointments. His goal in that was to have them block any attempts to have his tax returns released.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-19-2022 12:54 PM Tanypteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-20-2022 1:58 PM dwise1 has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022