|
|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
| EvC Forum active members: 38 (9278 total) |
|
| |
| GraceAloneSaves | |
| KolbyPea | |
| Total: 923,600 Year: 342/3,580 Month: 38/304 Week: 12/26 Day: 0/0 Hour: 0/0 |
| Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
| Author | Topic: Choosing a faith | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Percy Member Posts: 23637 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 6.4 |
Theodoric writes in Message 3825: Taq writes in Message 3823: Theodoric writes: As I have asked many times on this site. Show us any contemporary historical evidence for a historical jesus.The article is not an unsupported assertion. The assertion is supported throughout the article. Namely, there is no historical evidence for the jesus character. No one can prove he did not exist. That you expect such a thing, just reaffirms your inability to understand or present a fact based, logical argument. A negative can not be proven. In the end, the historicity of Jesus isn't something even worth arguing over. I'm willing to accept that there may have been someone named Jesus who led a religious movement, even if just for the purposes of moving the discussion along. It really isn't that important of a point. For example, there is no doubt that Joseph Smith was an actual living person, but I don't see this fact convincing swaths of people to convert to Mormonism. What it really comes down to is the claims attached to the person, not simply the existence of that person. Good for you. I do not feel the same way. I know you're replying to Taq, but I wasn't sure how to interpret this. Do you just mean that you don't accept that Jesus may have been a real person who led a religious movement? My own view is that there is no way to know whether Paul based his Jesus upon a real person or a composite of real people, or just made him up out of whole cloth. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Theodoric Member (Idle past 318 days) Posts: 9489 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined:
|
I do not accept that Jesus was a real person. But I do not find that insignificant. Christianity hinges on the fact that it was founded by a real person called Jesus who was executed by the Romans around 30 CE.
We need to treat this as we do all science. History needs to be investigated with a scientific vigor. Feelings of woo just don't cut it anymore. Until there is evidence for a Jesus, we can make the reasonable and factual inference that there was no Jesus of the bible. Why should we give credence to any idea that has absolute no factual evidence?Alos looking at the Taq post. Yes, we have contemporary, historical evidence for John Smith. But not John Frum or Ned Ludd. Pythagoras? No. Homer? No. The Buddha? No. Sun Tzu? No. What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up, why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Percy Member Posts: 23637 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 6.4 |
Theodoric writes in Message 3827: Christianity hinges on the fact that it was founded by a real person called Jesus who was executed by the Romans around 30 CE. Yep. If the question is whether the Jesus of the gospels was a real person, then for me the answer is no. But if the question is whether a real person lies at the core of the Jesus myth, someone who did none of the things described in the gospels but who was a religious person of some sort, then for me that is unanswerable. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Candle3 Member Posts: 1021 Joined: |
Paulk, you stated:
"The final head of the HRE would be Francis II up to hisabdication in 1806. I don’t know why you are using the future tense about somebody who died the best part of 200 years ago." ***The HRE consisted of 10 to 12 or so nations in Europe,aligned themselves with the RCC. There is nothing that would prevent this from happening again. The leadership consisted of oth Church and state leaders.The secular ruler most often controlled most of the power, but not always. It is called the HRE, but the Germanic people were the mainnationality that controlled it. Four of the first six emperors were Germanic. Italy was not even an united country until the 1860's. Thesame is true for the nation of Germany. It is not the Italian Catholic Church or the Holy Italian Empire. The main force and power behind the HRE has been Germany. The end time resurrection will consist of ten of these nations,led by Germany. The RCC will also exercise great power. The false prophet (Pope) will be able to perform miracles by the power of Satan. A careful reading of Daniel 7 and 8 reveals that the fourthbeast is the same as the beast in Revelation. The fourth beast is destroyed by Christ at His coming Daniel did not even comprehend the true meaning of hisvisions (Dan 12:8). The interpretation was sealed until the "time of the end." The RCC is the harlot that rides the Scarlet colored beast.The beast consists of the ten kings (nations). Beast can refer to the secular leader, or 10 nations, or Satan,depending on the context. It is important to note than the fourth beast in Daniel 7 and 8,as well as the harlot and Scarlet colored beast in Revelation will be destroyed at the return of Christ. My Church understands who the Germanic people descendedfrom. We also understand who the Israelites are. In Revelation 17:8 the beast is described as the "beast thatwas, and is not, and yet is." These are the seven resurrections of the beast. Talking about the seven headed beast verse 10 states "Thereare also seven kings. Five had fallen, ONE IS, and the other is not yet come." The Church understood that Hitler was the one that is. Hewas the sixth head. The Church understood this while WW2 was happening Knowing that Germans are the descendants of Assyria, wealso understood that East and West Germany would be reunited, even when the Berlin Wall was erected. According to the Bible, the ruler of the next head will be moreIntelligent and more ruthless that Hitler. The beast will ascend out of the bottomless pit verse 8.Many of Germany's best and brightest went underground after WW2. The GE man leaders were well aware that Germany would losethe war as early as 1941. They went into hiding, preparing for their reemergence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PaulK Member Posts: 18391 Joined: Member Rating: 4.5 |
quote:Not really and a new set of nations wouldn’t be the Holy Roman Empire. So you’ve still got nothing. quote: You do have some silly fantasies.
quote: A careful reading would not make such a silly mistake. Daniel 7 and 8 are referring to events that either happened or were supposed to happen more than 200 years before the Revelation was even written. Daniel 8 is particularly clear on the matter.
quote: So Germanic people are Israelites except when they aren’t. Your churches fantasies aren’t very consistent, are they?
quote: I think that fantasy is just a little out of date, don’t you? Aren’t they all going to be dead by now - of old age, if nothing else. Really you do preach ridiculous nonsense.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Candle3 Member Posts: 1021 Joined: |
Paulk, you stated:
"So Germanic people are Israelites except when they aren’t.Your churches fantasies aren’t very consistent, are they? ***I don't recall anyone ever saying that the Germanic people and the Israelites are the same people. The Germanic people have always been a thorn in the side of Israel. Ancient Assyria, whose descendants make up the bulk ofGermany today, conquered the northern ten tribes of Israel in 721 B.C. The Assyrians removed the Israelites from Samaria, whichwas the custom at the time, and replaced them with Gentiles. The southern tribe of Judah (the Jews) was never conqueredby Assyria. It was conquered by the Babylonians in 586 B.C. The ten northern tribes of Israel had been removed from theirhomeland 135 years before. All Jews are Israelites, but not all Israelites are Jews. Kind oflike all Canadians are North Americans, but not all North Americans are Canadians. When one does not understand what is so easily understood,they will never grasp what is right in front of them. The fourth beast in Daniel 7 and the seven headed beast inRevelation are one and the same The Bible is a book primarily about Israel. Other nations arementioned when they come into contact with Israel. They Bible tells of their influence on Israel. The ten Israelitish tribes are primarily in northern and westernEurope, as well as the U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, England, Scotland, and a few more. It is these tribes that the beast exerted great influence over.WW1 and WW2 cost these nations, as well as the Jews, dearly. The Bible foretell that the Assyrians (Germany) will conquerIsrael and Judah one final time. This is how the Church knew beyond any shadow of a doubt that East and West Germany would be reunited.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Candle3 Member Posts: 1021 Joined: |
Paulk, you wrote:
A careful reading would not make such a silly mistake. Daniel7 and 8 are referring to events that either happened or were supposed to happen more than 200 years before the Revelation was even written. Daniel 8 is particularly clear on the matter. ***You 're living in the past. You have been taught a certainconcept and you refuse to see it. Antiochus was terrible to the Jews. Everyone knows this, buthe said is not the end time beast. The Apostles asked Jesus what would be thee sign of Hiscoming, and the end of this age. Jesus describes events of the End time. Matthew 24. Jesus clearly stated in Matthew 24:15 "Therefore when you seethe "abomination of desolation," spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the Holy place" (whoever reads, let him understand), Did you read this! Jesus said that the abomination ofdesolations would not occur for another 2000 years. It occurs roughly 2200 years after the death of Antiochus Whomever reads this is encourag d to understand. Daniel 8: 23-26 describes the end time ruler of the theseventh head of the beast, with the ten kings. Notice carefully: the end time beast will fight against thePrince of princes (This is Jesus, in His return to set up His Kingdom. Verse 25 informs us that this man and the beast will bebroken without human means. This is also true of the beast in Revelations,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PaulK Member Posts: 18391 Joined: Member Rating: 4.5 |
quote: The English are a Germanic people - isn’t the whole point of the Anglo-Israelite nonsense to try to pretend that the English are Israelite? It’s even in the name.
quote: Well that explains your problem.
quote: Wrong again. Edited by PaulK, : Fixed a tag
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PaulK Member Posts: 18391 Joined: Member Rating: 4.5 |
quote: Unsurprisingly you are reversing the truth. My ideas come from reading the Book of Daniel while you are just repeating what you’ve been taught. Daniel 8:20-23 clearly point to the Hellenistic era. If you relied on carefully reading Daniel 7-8 you would see it - it is undeniable. For anyone who disagrees I can only echo your words:
When one does not understand what is so easily understood,
Because that is exactly what is happening.
they will never grasp what is right in front of them quote: And yet the time indicated by Daniel 8:20-23 was already past before Jesus was born.
quote:That would be rather difficult with Jesus yet to be born. Again, read Daniel 8 carefully and maybe you shall manage to see what is right before your eyes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
dwise1 Member Posts: 6435 Joined: Member Rating: 4.9
|
This is also true of the beast in Revelations, Oh, you mean like this (from my Message 269:
dwise1 writes:
As I've related, I received my fundamentalist training as a "fellow traveler" of the Jesus Freak Movement circa 1970. At that time they fixated on biblical literalism and inerrancy, demonology (eg, seeing demons at work everywhere, especially in cases of sleep paralysis), and the End Times. That last included a common pasttime of seeing prophecies of the impending onset of the Tribulation and trying to identify the Antichrist. They also taught that the Antichrist would seduce most Christians, but they would never fall for that trick! Ironically, the best candidates for the Antichrist are Trump and Putin (personally, I think Putin would be the Antichrist and Trump the Beast) who have seduced and recruited those fundamentalists. Despite glaringly clear signs that they would have immediately seen and seized upon half a century ago. For example, Trump's ear wound from the assassination attempt whose immediate and complete healing Trump dismissed as a miracle of his "incredible ability to heal". We got "reports" of his wound that half his ear had been blown off (from Donnie Jr.) and, despite a complete blocking of information (so much for K.Rose's promise of transparency from Trump), something about a 2-cm gash (about ¾ inch). Although the first photo showed a small band-aid on Trump's ear, for his next public appearance he had what looked like a feminine hygiene product taped over his ear (with the audience mimicking him that should have given Kotex windfall earnings), then after a few appearances carrying on that charade he showed up with no bandaging and no sign of any wound (which he "hanged a lantern on" by boasting of his good genes for healing). My fundamentalist training kicked in immediately and I remembered the fundie descriptions of the the Beast, for which I tracked down this passage from Revelation (my bolding included):
Revelation 13, KJV: The old-school/New-Age "true Christians" (AKA Jesus Freaks circa 1970) would eagerly seek out the identity of the AntiChrist based on the slimmest of correlations, and yet here He is plain as day right in front of them and they trample each other in the rush to worship Him. Go figure. That's at least one fulfilled prophesy they would constantly intone, that even Christians would be deceived and seduced by the AntiChrist. Too bad it's a self-fulfilled prophesy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Candle3 Member Posts: 1021 Joined: |
Dwise, only God can increase one's understanding of the Bible.
He does not reveal it to fools who are only trying to find fault with it. Spiritual matters are nothing but foolishness to those who donot have the Holy Spirit dwelling in them. I was taught from a young age that sinners will burn in a lakeof fire for eternity. I was taught that Sunday had replaced the 7th day Sabbath. I was taught that the Holy Spirit was a person, that he was themember of a Trinity, I was taught that God was going full force in trying to save theworld during this present age. I was taught these lies, as well as others. It was not easy for me to change my thinking. It did not happenovernight. I prayed long and hard for God to help me find the truth. God led me to study and to prove everything. I did not like toadmit that I had been deceived for all those years. I never just accepted what the Church taught. I still had toprove it myself. And, I always trusted in the Lord to guide me Years ago God put a man in my path that challengedeverything that I thought I knew about God and His plan for us I was arrogant, and I tried to prove him wrong. But the moreI searched the more my mind changed. When someone seeks God they must do it with absoluterespect and great humility. One must be patient.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
dwise1 Member Posts: 6435 Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
OK, so you have not learned anything and you're back to blathering bullshit. OK, same old, same old.
Just please try to refrain from returning to spouting those stupid creationist bullshit lies again. Which reminds me that I should complete that topic I created for you, Radiocarbon Dating Discussion with candle2. Even though you will just continue to refuse to even look at it, let alone read it, but others can learn from it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Taq Member Posts: 10563 Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
Candle3 writes: Dwise, only God can increase one's understanding of the Bible.He does not reveal it to fools who are only trying to find fault with it. Spiritual matters are nothing but foolishness to those who do not have the Holy Spirit dwelling in them. That's straight out of the cult playbook. If you disagree with the cult leader it's because you haven't had the right information magicked into your head. The only way to know if you have the right information is if you agree with the cult leader.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
dwise1 Member Posts: 6435 Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
AND you completely avoided replying to my Message 3835. Deflect and divert. How disgustingly dishonest and typical of you!
Anyone who actually believed what the Bible says (such as the Jesus Freaks of 1970) would immediately see a connection between Rev 13:3-4 and Trumpian farce about his injured ear and its "miraculous healing". And yet you, who claims to believe the Bible and all that, go out of your way to avoid seeing it, not even for explaining it away. Why have you forsaken your belief in the Bible? Because you have joined the Cult of Trump? Because you now worship Trump instead of the Bible? Because Trump has replaced God in your eyes? What is wrong with you?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Candle3 Member Posts: 1021 Joined: |
Dwise, you state:
"Just please try to refrain from returning to spouting thosestupid creationist bullshit lies again." ***Don't worry. I have outgrown that ridiculous and sophomoricpostulation of evolution.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2026
