Is ID falsifiable by any kind of experiment?

Tell me again.

No, you didn't. All you did was assert.

Your opinion does not matter.

You might want to learn the definitions of words. I did not state an opinion. It was an observation based upon empirical evidence.

Finding a tree pattern is exactly what we should see if life is related. We see a tree pattern. Therefore, that tree pattern is one of many pieces of evidence for relatedness.Can you please show me the flaw in this logic?

It does not prove relationship, period!You are so dense and biased, that you seem to think otherwise.

Why doesn't it prove beyond a reasonable doubt that life is related?

There are things that show tree patterns, but these things have not evolved by cumulating small and random changes.So logic dictates that pattern does not prove evolution at all. I know you rather want to ignore logic and hold on to your false belief. But that is not how I roll.

All of science disagrees with you. And, of course, we know your intellectual blind spot due to your strong religious bias.The facts are quite clear. You are quite wrong.And you still cannot produce this "evidence" of violations of common ancestry and the nested hierarchy in any life system you so boldly insist you have.Why?We know why. Such does not exist.As I said earlier, this was your put-up or shut-up moment, sensei. And as I predicted you are incapable of either.

Where is the evidence for this claim? All you have is a claim without evidence. Your logic fails.

Your opinion and false claims are not important.

Hierarchical clustering is a known method, with many variations and distance metrics. All of them produce tree patterns for practically any set of data.If you are under the illusion that life on earth is the only data that produces nesting, out of the countless of datasets that we have, you are more delusional than flat earthers.

Not to you, obviously. Your world doesn't deal in reality.As Taq has said, your inability to substantively address the evidence is noted.

All you do is repeating the same useless argument that science agrees with you. You have nothing useful to add.

Your opinion and false claims are not important. That's because science does agree with us. Reality is all there is and needs nothing added. The issue is that YOU cannot show anything otherwise despite your insistence the science is wrong.