Winter: Baby, It's Cold Outside!

They forgot to mention that in some regions, particularly in northern Australia, the coastline is sinking up to 5mm/yr ... just as the Tuvalu islands are sinking a bit every year and have been for probably thousands of years. What percentage of the 5mm rise is due to anthropological climate change and what percentage is due to natural climate change?

Sources and data please.
​

With Dredge and his ilk it's hard to know whether it's stupidity or just lies. I'm thinking the latter just to cause a bit of outrage - reckon he gets off on it.Meanwhile, back in the real world:

Yep, no doubt about it ... rising sea-levels are such a concern in Australia that no one ever talks about it and even the climate bed-wetters in the mass media don't bother reporting it. Funny, that.

Tuvalu consists of three reef islands and six true atolls, resulting from volcanic activity. Atolls are crescent-shaped bcoz they are the remnant of a volcanic crater that once stood perhaps hundreds of meters above sea-level. Erosion from ocean waves can eventually reduce volcanic islands to nothing.Furthermore, Tuvalu lies on the most tectonically-active region on earth - the Pacific "Ring of Fire". Vertical movement of tectonic plates can cause an island to sink into the sea.

As a result of the 1931 Napier earthquake in New Zealand, 40 square-kilometres of sea-bed rose up to become dry land.
If tectonic activity can raise land out of the sea, it can also lower land into the sea. But bed-wetting climate scientists ignore that possibility - they never see land sinking; they only see seas rising.

The good news is, all the global warming bs and hysteria is resulting in the reduction of many forms of pollution in many parts of the world, which I wholeheartedly support (within reason).What industrialised nations should do is adopt nuclear energy. Muslim and black nations can be trusted with nuclear energy (for different reasons), so they will have to reply on coal-fired power stations. (How come I'm so smart?)

Er, no. A few places only ... nothing like "the rest of the world". It's kinda disturbing that telling lies seems to come so naturally to you. Oh, so scientists can infallibly and accurately determine what temperatures were 50,000 years ago? Sounds like bs to me.I'm surprised you haven't pulled out the "unprecedented" card yet.

Oh, here it is ... "hottest ever" = unprecedented". What crap.How can these con-men possibly know recent temperatures include the world's "hottest ever average temperature"?

The mainstream media is so clueless and gullible. They're like little children ... they'll believe anything.

Dredge, u gotcha singular and plural mixed up in that post. Idiot.

Feminism (the demonic enemy of motherhood) - as anti-life and genocidal as it is - isn't doing enough to reduce populations.
It's about time an evil entity like the Democrats introduced euthanising the elderly ... start with anyone over 80 (sorry Mr. Biden) and gradually make the cut-off age lower and lower.

Thank you for this fine example of Climate Babble.

You're welcome. I didn't want to get too technical on you since I now the problems you have with facts and reality.

I appreciate your kind consideration of my cerebral limitations. Thank you.