Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,519 Year: 3,776/9,624 Month: 647/974 Week: 260/276 Day: 32/68 Hour: 1/12


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why is it Evolution versus Creation?
Brian
Member (Idle past 4982 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 42 of 45 (368941)
12-11-2006 7:19 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by geatz
12-07-2006 11:14 PM


Here's a deal!
Here is what I know. The Bible's historical inaccuracies every year are becoming accurate.
Here's an offer for you.
For every historical 'inaccuracy' in the Bible that you 'know' has been confirmed as accurate, I'll post five that have been shown to be still inaccurate.
So, can you give one example of an alleged inaccuracy that is now deemed as accurate.
What can be said without any fear of contradiction is that since 'archaeology' began in the Near East around the mid 19th century, the problems for many biblical narratives have become unsurmountable.
Looking forward to your example of an alleged inaccuracy that is now no longer considered inaccurate.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by geatz, posted 12-07-2006 11:14 PM geatz has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4982 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 43 of 45 (368942)
12-11-2006 7:22 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by geatz
12-08-2006 12:20 AM


but the concensus does not believe this to be so.
So, concensus equals true?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by geatz, posted 12-08-2006 12:20 AM geatz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Percy, posted 12-11-2006 10:51 AM Brian has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024