The Gospel of John was written by the disiciple John
No, it wasn't. John wasn't writted until 100-120 AD. How could it have been written by an eyewitness?
The historian Josephus author of, The Jewish War, The Jewish Antiquities, Life, and Against Apion.
Josephus largely copied the Bible. He had no independant knowledge of the bible events, and again, wasn't even writing until decades after Jesus was said to have lived.
Tacticus author of, annals of Rome, he wrote
Tacitus recounted nothing but what the Christians at the time had told him. He represents no independant confirmation of the bible stories.
You can look up the authors I posted earlier for more documentary evidence for the existence of Jesus and him as a miricle worker.
None of your authors provide any kind of evidence; they're simply recounting what the Christians told them.
Maybe you simply don't understand how stories are corroborated. If I come up and tell you a story about seeing a UFO, and then you tell
your friends "Crash says he saw a UFO", your version of the story doesn't corroborate mine. That's the same deal with all your authors. They're simply repeating what they were told; the original source of their information is still the stories that eventually formed the Bible.
Nothing, if all that mattered in a court case was DNA evidence we'd have many criminals in the street and innocent people in jail.
...wha?
Luke author of about 1/4 of the new testament is very accurate as an historian.
That may be, but so what? Just because he was right about some things doesn't mean we can just take his word on everything.
What about the historical evidence for Jesus I just pointed out.
What evidence? Authors who all heard the same story? Bibles written a century after the fact by persons unknown?
Even if I assumed evolution were possible, to think that all the different creatures in this world came from evolution would be a mathematical improbobability (in my opinion) even if the world were a trillion years old.(I have my undergrade in Mathematics, I'm not a mathematical genius, but I know what is an accepted mathemtical improbability.)
Really? Then I'm sure you'll have no trouble at all performing that calculation. Be sure to show your work.
We're waiting...
Why do evolutionists attack those that look for holes in their theory?
Well, we don't. We simply explain how they're wrong about the holes.
It's people like the creationalists that help us to find the real truth because they question that which is believed to be true.
I'm sure that makes you feel better but it's simply untrue. Creationists have never, ever advanced scientific thinking. Rather, science has always been advanced by scientists employing the tools of the scientific method to advance knowledge.
™ Version 4.2