Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,845 Year: 4,102/9,624 Month: 973/974 Week: 300/286 Day: 21/40 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are thoughts transcendant?
petrophysics1
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 142 (428099)
10-14-2007 4:59 PM


On thought and telepathy
Thought I’d give a general reply to this topic
LindaLou: Telepathy may be some good evidence of this.
LindaLou: I see what you're saying here I think -- that I'm ascribing something supernatural to a process that we simply do not understand now, but may understand in the future.
NJ; We've never witnessed anyone's thoughts.
molbiogirl: Telepathy is bunk.
The topic here is “is thought transcendent?”, and although it has been asked “What the hell does that mean?” I’ll take the route of does thought continue to exist after you have thought something.
The answer to this is, I believe, Yes. It does relate to telepathy.
When a person is thinking the electrical activity in their brain is changing, it is also changing in response to the various experiences they are having right now, or when they remember past experiences. This is a change in current flow.
From basic physics we know that ANY change in current flow will produce an electromagnetic wave. Turn on a light and you have sent out an electromagnetic wave. Lightning creates EM waves, in fact since there are thousands and thousands of lightning storms happening right now worldwide this naturally occurring EM radiation is used to do AFMAG surveys usually looking for metallic mineral deposits. Radio waves, microwaves, visible light, UV are all the same thing, EM radiation, the only difference is the frequency.
So if you are thinking as you read this you are also broadcasting. You can’t help it, it’s just physics.
Can humans detect EM radiation. Of course, we can see. So can lots of other creatures, and sharks can detect fish in their area that are in distress by sensing electrical impulses. Detecting EM radiation is not unusual and it happened quite early in evolutionary history.
Can you read other people’s thoughts? Let’s think about this for a moment. They are broadcasting, but so are you. I’ve been an amateur radio operator since I was 13 in 1962, and financed my undergraduate degree in geology by working as an electronics technician. You can not broadcast and receive on the same frequency at the same time. Your broadcasting will be billions of times larger than any signal you can receive.
What follows does not apply to the average person in the same way having an IQ of 180 doesn’t apply to the average person either. Can a person “silence” their mind, shut down their mental activity? Everything conscious and unconscious except life support systems. Most people can not and most have all kinds of stuff running up there they don’t know about. An example, close one eye, does the world still look 3D? For most people it does, but it is physically impossible to see 3D with one eye. So you must have some mechanism or circuit running upstairs. Turn it off. Bet you can’t. A mind out of control of its owner.
You can turn it off by getting in a car, and deciding to drive across America without ever sleeping. Sooner or later you will get so tired you will lose “depth perception” and crash. Or you could “find” it and figure out how to turn it on and off at will. I can do this. It took me a long time and I have no idea if you can learn how to do it or not.
Most people can not play music by ear, most are not intelligent enough to be a research scientist, most can not learn a second language later in life and have no accent, most do not have a photographic memory, most do not have an IQ of 180, but there are people who exist today in all those categories. Just because the average person can’t do it doesn’t mean it can not be done. It may mean it is just very rare.
From my viewpoint if someone actually wanted to do research on telepathy they would look for people who could innately silence their mind or had learned to do so, instead of just collecting any idiot off the street.
So far in my 58 years I know well only two people who can “see/perceive” what other people are thinking. A fellow named Frank I had worked with at one time back in NY and me. I’ve come across a few others in Lily Dale a spiritualist community where mediums “contact” the dead. Actually what they do is perceive what someone is thinking about their deceased loved ones and describe what they “see”. Most mediums there aren’t very good and some are fakes.
None contact the dead.
BTW even though I can perceive other people’s thoughts I have no psychic/spiritual ability. I only detect EM radiation people are naturally putting out. I don’t do it very often since most of the time like everyone else I’m occupied thinking and if a person is primarily thinking in words and symbols I don’t perceive that very well. They have to be thinking of an actual event in their lives. Let me give you an example. When my older son was 9 he mentioned that nobody could read people’s thoughts. I told him that some people could and asked him to close his eyes and recall sometime in his life when he was having a good time and keep thinking about it, but to say absolutely nothing. I then shut everything off and became a “total observer paying attention”. What happened was I felt something across the upper part of my chest and when I “looked” at “paid close attention” to it, I realized and saw in my mind that I was in a swimming pool (could feel that water lapping against my chest) and saw my older brother standing at the side of the pool on his deck( this was a “picture” from my son’s viewpoint as it would have had to have been, he was doing the recalling). So I said to my son it was the summer before last, you are in Uncle Joe’s pool looking up at him on the deck. His mouth dropped open, yes that was exactly what he was recalling.
No big deal.
Is thought transcendent? Do radio waves and light waves last forever? Thought results in the same thing. Ask a physicist, I think they might, but I’m not sure.
Edited by petrophysics, : No reason given.
Edited by petrophysics, : No reason given.
Edited by petrophysics, : two for typos, one to fix quote boxes

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by anglagard, posted 10-14-2007 8:42 PM petrophysics1 has replied
 Message 52 by Taz, posted 10-14-2007 11:14 PM petrophysics1 has not replied
 Message 55 by nator, posted 10-15-2007 6:41 PM petrophysics1 has not replied
 Message 56 by crashfrog, posted 10-15-2007 8:26 PM petrophysics1 has not replied
 Message 59 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-15-2007 9:53 PM petrophysics1 has not replied

  
petrophysics1
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 142 (428128)
10-14-2007 8:50 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by anglagard
10-14-2007 8:42 PM


Re: On thought and telepathy
From a con man? I'd be in court for years and can make more money finding oil and gas and have.
Besides it is not a psychic ability, unless you consider seeing as being psychic as well.
P.S. I'd consider doing it for a university, but they need to pay my consulting fee since this would cut into geology work($1250/day plus expenses).
Edited by petrophysics, : P.S.added

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by anglagard, posted 10-14-2007 8:42 PM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by anglagard, posted 10-14-2007 9:19 PM petrophysics1 has replied

  
petrophysics1
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 142 (428141)
10-14-2007 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by anglagard
10-14-2007 9:19 PM


Re: On thought and telepathy
I used the term con man because a year or so ago I looked at the fine print on that offer and basically if Randi doesn't want to pay up he won't. So the offer looks like a PR pitch not a real offer.
Second, I am unfamiliar with the term 'seeing' used in the context of telepathy except in the works of Carlos Castaneda.
If you are talking about the word "seeing" I used in the last post I was just refering to normal sight which is detecting electromagnet radiation.
As far as seeing with regards to telepathy when I do this I see in my mind what the other person is recalling seeing, I usually feel their recalled physical sensations as well and often hear the recalled sounds or speach. Very very rarely I have the sense of smell also. Just like in a dream, only I'm awake.
People who can recall things well(see it etc. in their mind)are much easier to receive/perceive. Kids are great they have less trash going on in their minds than most adults. The worst are druggies or people who have used lots of drugs in the past. Their pictures are often chaotic and not in any proper time sequence. Looks like something has happened to their ability to recall things compared to people who have never used drugs. This can be spotted in normal conversation if you know what to look for.
I have heard of Carlos Castenada, but don't know anything about him. I think my Ex of many years ago read some of his books for some anthropology class she was taking.
I am not interested in being a publically known person or changing the entire understanding of paranormal phenomena. I also do not enjoy writing, which is why I have only 60 posts but have read thousands here.
I do exactly what I like doing which is solving geologic and borehole geophysical problems and making and drilling my own gas and oil prospects.
Why are you being so selfish concerning your gifts?
I don't consider telling people that if they can silence their mind they too maybe able to do this and then proposing a natural mechanism by which it works to be selfish. Plus some psychology student might read it and get an idea for masters or PhD research. Hardly selfish of me.
Do you think there's something I can do with this "gift"? Do you want to know what everyone is thinking? Why?
The real gold here is in finding everything in your mind so it can be still. The perceiving of other people's thoughts is just something that showed up and I had to find a rational explanation for it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by anglagard, posted 10-14-2007 9:19 PM anglagard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by crashfrog, posted 10-15-2007 8:36 PM petrophysics1 has not replied

  
petrophysics1
Inactive Member


Message 89 of 142 (428932)
10-18-2007 6:17 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by Taz
10-15-2007 11:45 PM


Re: On thought and telepathy
Taz writes:
Nem writes:
And isn't this the goal of deep meditation? I have tried to meditate so deeply that, literally, no thoughts come in.
I've tried really deep meditation, too. All I can say is I'm not there yet. May never get there.
Taz (and also NJ & LindaLou)
40 years ago I was the same way. If today I stop thinking consciously, in my mind there is total silence. No stray thoughts, images, nothing. I am just observing the world and my mind is adding nothing to it, my mind is not biasing the world I observe.
This is not something I'm doing, I merely stop thinking. This is the state of mind you need to be in to see anothers thoughts. If you have things going on in your mind out of your control or conscious knowledge you can not tell the difference between what you are doing and something from outside yourself.
It took me from the time I was 19 until I was 38 to do this. I can explain it in greater depth but I am very busy consulting right now so it may have to wait a day or so.
The experiment you proposed won't work, but it got me to thinking of ways to make one as simple as possible. Found some interesting articles on fractal spectral analysis of EEG and people having the same response to different scents, people responding to EM unless their head (and is this wierd) their kidneys are shielded, baboons sensing electric fields both static and AC(EM), a WHO report stating that whales, dolphins and humans have biomagnetic in their brains and many others. Our brain waves are close in frequency to the naturally occuring ELF (EM radiation) that the earth naturally produces and all life is bathed in from birth to death. No surprise since we evolved here.
I am finishing up consulting today so will be back with a fairly long post answering other questions, possible experiments to verify human detection of EM (non visible) radiation, and post the papers and links. I have several pages in Word at present but must organize it.
I'll also deal with the psychological problems of the Holy Army of the Atheist Inquisition which has showed up here.
For NJ, radio waves ARE electromagnetic radiation. This is what I'm talking about:
Gamma ray ” X-ray ” Ultraviolet ” Visible spectrum ” Infrared ” Terahertz radiation ” Microwave ” Radio waves
Electromagnetic radiation - Wikipedia
The only difference between any of these words used for electromagnetic radiation is the FREQUENCY.
I agree with the following:
Nation Academy of Science
"Science is not the only way of acquiring knowledge about ourselves and the world around us. Humans gain understanding in many other ways, such as through literature, the arts, philosophical reflection, and religious experience. Scientific knowledge may enrich aesthetic and moral perceptions, but these subjects extend beyond science's realm, which is to obtain a better understanding of the natural world."
It appears to me some people on this board do not agree with this statement. If that's the case I'm not interested in hearing from you. Take your psychological problems somewhere else.
Edited by petrophysics, : No reason given.
Edited by petrophysics, : typos

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Taz, posted 10-15-2007 11:45 PM Taz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by Kitsune, posted 10-18-2007 9:44 AM petrophysics1 has not replied
 Message 95 by nator, posted 10-22-2007 7:31 PM petrophysics1 has not replied

  
petrophysics1
Inactive Member


Message 107 of 142 (430201)
10-23-2007 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by Quetzal
10-23-2007 3:50 PM


Re: On thought and telepathy
I'm just tempted to reply to this bit:
But are you willing to throw out the whole of philosophy and religion, which examine the nature of life and existence, because they are not as "true" as a fossil or a rock?
Let's see, from my standpoint:
philosophy = metaphysical navel gazing. Put two philosophers in a room, ask whether the sky is blue, and you'll get three mutually contradictory answers.
religion = belief in the existence of something in the face of and in spite of an utter lack of evidence for that something. IOW, willfull self-delusion.
In a word: yes.
Talk about self delusion!
Did you know...
Students declaring an intention to go to graduate school in Philosophy score higher on the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) than all but four other major fields (out of fifty recorded by the Educational Testing Service, which runs the Graduate Record Exam)? The only fields that score higher mean scores on the combined Verbal, Quantitative, and Analytical sections of the GRE are (in rank order) Physics and Astronomy, Mathematical Sciences, Materials Engineering, and Chemical Engineering.
Philosophy students score higher than every other major in the Humanities and Arts, higher than every major in the Social Science, higher than every major in the Life Sciences, higher than every major in Education, higher than every major in Business, and higher than every major listed under "Other Fields." In fact, Philosophy students score higher than four out of the six majors listed in Physical Sciences, and five out of the seven listed in Engineering.
from http://www.lclark.edu/~phil/gre.html
also see :Page not found | College of Humanities and Social Sciences
So much for your "scientific" evaluation of philosophy.
Maybe you and others here ought to spend a little time figuring out how you are subconsciously biasing your data.
Of course AFTER you've biased your data then everything looks logical, to you at least.
Edited by petrophysics, : fix quote boxes

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Quetzal, posted 10-23-2007 3:50 PM Quetzal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by crashfrog, posted 10-23-2007 7:39 PM petrophysics1 has not replied
 Message 110 by Quetzal, posted 10-23-2007 9:59 PM petrophysics1 has not replied
 Message 119 by nator, posted 10-25-2007 6:37 AM petrophysics1 has replied

  
petrophysics1
Inactive Member


Message 121 of 142 (430427)
10-25-2007 9:16 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by nator
10-25-2007 6:37 AM


Re: On thought and telepathy
Petro, I wondered if you missed this message?
#55
No,I didn't.
However, show me how this relates to the subject of this thread.
If you wish an answer here, please have someone from ADMIN say it is OK for me to do that, since your question and my response seem to me to be off topic.
[ Home | Forums Summary | All Topics | Site Map | Contact Us ]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by nator, posted 10-25-2007 6:37 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by AdminQuetzal, posted 10-25-2007 9:53 AM petrophysics1 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024