Were Adam and Eve homo sapiens?

This argument seems circular to me could you please explain to me how it isn't?You argument looks like this.Premise 1: Humans have been around for 6000 years and have accomplished moon travel and a significant increase in population.Premise 2: It doesn't look like the things that are happening now happened 54,000 years ago.Conclusion: Humans have only been around for 6000 years.Do you see how the start of your premise "humans have been around for 6000 years" looks a lot like the conclusion to you argument "humans have been around for 6000 years?"What I see is.Humans have been around for hundreds of thousands of years (we come to this conclusion due to many independent scientific studies spanning many different fields) and it has taken all of that time to get people to the moon.

So you are defining humans as those who were around 6000 years ago, then concluding that humans have been around for 6000 years.I am arguing that it has taken hundreds of thousands of years for humans to get to the point (physically and socially) where humans were 6000 years ago.Your only evidence that humans came into existence 6000 years ago is that thats when we started writing stuff such that modern humans can read it (stone/continually rewriting/etc). Will you agree with me that it takes a lot more than just the ability to communicate to have pyramids, writings etc? A civilization where every member has to work all day long in order to get the food they need to survive probably can't build pyramids. They probably won't be too concerned about developing a written language when they don't have the time, nor need to read or write.You seem to be assuming that once a being can speak that the ability and desire to write are going to happen at the same time. This is why others have cited the development of the larynx and the 40,000 plus year history of human speech.