Typhus virus also attack the same organ: the lungs.
Er, that's not the location that's being talked about.
We have an actual survey poll of the known universe: no life on our cloest neighbours (moon, mars); no life in the solar system (voyager mission); no life outside our solar system as per telescopic and radiation imprints.
Yeah, but...
life on our planet. Somehow you managed to forget that one planet out of the 8 in the Solar System is actually
chock a block with life.
So by your astoundingly obtuse, simplistic logic, you're still forced to conclude that any given planet in the universe might have as much as a 1 in 8 chance of being life-bearing.
The unknown is more probably the same as the known than not
Sure. So, one in 8 for any given planet.
If life exists, at least some would be advanced enough to break the treshold of distance (advancement being time related, as with this planet).
Unless there's no level of advancement that allows one to break the laws of physics.
But let me ask you - if there's no life elsewhere in the universe - which even your arguments don't support - then where did the
Wow! Signal come from?
Here, the very theory of evolution can come apart, because it infers that it cannot occur elsewhere - else life would have emerged on the moon.
The moon has no atmosphere or liquid water.
On earth we have life in the most inhospitable conditions, including poisonous volcanic cores and where no light penetrates.
But, even those places there's an atmosphere and liquid water.
Even on Earth, life does not exist where there's not atmosphere and liquid water.
There is no valid reason that life does not exist in the diverse conditions in the known universe.
Yes, that's rather the point, isn't it? That there's no reason to believe that life should be limited to Earth?
™ Version 4.2
