Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,581 Year: 2,838/9,624 Month: 683/1,588 Week: 89/229 Day: 0/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What we must accept if we accept evolution Part 2
AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 301 (282573)
01-30-2006 12:47 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 301 (282721)
01-30-2006 9:25 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by macaroniandcheese
01-30-2006 8:55 PM


yeah generally that's what reading is for.
Perhaps it was not so intended, but that comes across as a bit of an insult.
You have been asked in the past to control your tendency to post one-liner smart-alec remarks.
When responding to a post in a different thread, the best option IMO, is to use the Gen Reply button for your reply, and to include a link to the message to which you are responding.
It's a bit late now to use Gen Reply, but it is not too late to go back, edit Message 6, and add the appropriate link.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-30-2006 8:55 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 301 (282738)
01-30-2006 11:06 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Faith
01-30-2006 10:48 PM


Re: MODERATOR ATTENTION PLEASE
Faith writes:
And because of your friendship with jar you should have recused yourself from this task.
However, in Message 53 you wrote "Ben, Buzsaw, nwr, Asgara. You're all online now. JAR is out of order." It seems to me that you asked AdminAsgara to intervene. In the circumstances, it is unreasonable to say she should have recused herself.
Jar is presenting what he believes is a refutation of your claim. It seems to me that you have three choices:
(1) withdraw your claim;
(2) provide a convincing argument that jar is mistaken;
(3) ignore jar's posts, and allow the readers of this thread to determine whether jar has refuted your claim.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Faith, posted 01-30-2006 10:48 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Faith, posted 01-30-2006 11:07 PM AdminNWR has not replied

AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 158 of 301 (283021)
01-31-2006 11:13 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by iamaelephant
01-31-2006 9:11 PM


Welcome aboard
Welcome, iamaelephant.
I am disappointed at the chilly reception you received from one or two of our members. Please disregard their rudeness. We are glad to have you join the debate.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by iamaelephant, posted 01-31-2006 9:11 PM iamaelephant has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024