Scientific vs Creationist Frauds and Hoaxes

Well, what I should like to ask these creationist you've been talking to is --- where are their citations.Otherwise: Newton lied about the orbit of the moon. Look, someone said it on the Internet!

Any true thing would be significant. However, this is not significant because it is not true.

I did say it would be significant. It just isn't true. Was that intended to be written in English? Only it isn't.

Then you have uncovered the biggest conspiracy of all time.But what would be the motivation for such a hoax?

Well, yes, of course, we've all read that sort of stuff.But I wanted Genologist to put forward his own opinions.

But anyone perpetrating evolution as a hoax knows that there is a creator. If they didn't know it, it wouldn't be a hoax. All the hoaxers (as distinct from their dupes) must be creationists. So why do a bunch of convinced and assured creationists go about pretending that there's no creator? What are they getting out of it? It cannot be, as you seem to be suggesting, a disbelief in a creator --- if they possessed such a disbelief, then they wouldn't be creationists and it wouldn't be a hoax.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This seems to me to be convincing evidence that the hoaxer was Dawson and that his motive was a desire for recognition.

If you look at the rest of the links he supplies, they are overwhelmingly not to articles which are examples of a hoax being perpetrated, but to articles which debunk the hoax. Like this one. So what makes you think he intended it to be an instance of the former rather than the latter class?

If I posted here every time a creationist told a lie, I'd never do anything else. However, here's something new. The Discovery Institute made a video of one of their scientumists talking crap in a nice-looking laboratory ... ... specifically, this nice-looking laboratory.Says it all, doesn't it? That is very nearly everything anyone needs to know about "creation science".What does their "Biologic Institute" actually look like? I'm guessing it doesn't have any actual scientific equipment in it. Or a waste paper basket.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Insofar as this means anything, it is obviously false.I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the English language before you post again, so as to avoid posting more things that aren't true. hoax (hks)
n.

That is a peculiar thing to post in reply to RAZD's post, which read, in full: Could you begin by pointing out which bit of his post you consider to be bashing creationism?