jf writes:
was covered by the anionic cationic mineral sediments
care to explain how something can be negative and positive at the same time?
see, last time I checked, you can either have a postive or negative charge with molecules (neutral doesn't count--no charge).
with everything else told by you making no sense, it's no surprise that I see this ass backwards statement.
you're not winning any arguments over here--especially with the claim of a negative positive sediment.
All a man's knowledge comes from his experiences