Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,745 Year: 4,002/9,624 Month: 873/974 Week: 200/286 Day: 7/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Debate - Ongoing controversy, the EvC question
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1529 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 28 of 40 (108073)
05-13-2004 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by coledude
05-13-2004 10:21 PM


coledude writes:
This does fit creationism however because we never claim life must arise from non-life. God is the source of all life.
Welcome to EvC Coledude. I was wondering how it is life on this planet came about from non life if not by some mechanism yet to be explained. Life IS on this planet and it had to start somehow. Just because it is not known yet the "how" does not mean science can take a short cut theory and say God did it nuff said. With that attitude why even bother with scientific discovery at all. There is a great deal that has been discovered that was not known in the past and I venture to say the more we/mankind learns the less we/mankind needs to attribute it all to mythology. IMO. **edit to include word mankind
This message has been edited by 1.61803, 05-13-2004 10:53 PM

"One is punished most for ones virtues" Fredrick Neitzche

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by coledude, posted 05-13-2004 10:21 PM coledude has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024