Thats very interesting Crashfrog, Those rules seem to beonly for creationists to obey. Sounds like the rules of evolution & the rules of the game. Lets see.
1. Creation is very falsifiable. evolutionists point to there problems with it etc
2. Its a funny thing when Evolutionists discard evidence against evolution. Not because there is no evidence. But because it does not fit the evolutionary framework
3. Well unfortunately evolution has indoctrinated most scientific communities,schools,universities. So creationism is not accepted by the mainstream. Not because its not science but because they say its not science ohh and who could forget those great quotes from the book "Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science" -
"There is no debate between the scientific community over wheather evolution occured, and there is no evidence that evolution has not occured" page 4
"Creation science is the idea that scienctific evidence can support a literal interpretation of Genesis..scientist have looked at the arguments and found they are not supported by verifiable data" page 9
Actually its because the evidence does not fit the framwork at all. You say creationists arent scientist because they reject all that is in conflict with theres well evolutionists do the exact damm thing!. Its just your bias that stops you from accepting there evidence and accepting evolutions theory. Nothing more nothing less!.
™ Version 4.2