Debate - Ongoing controversy, the EvC question

Almeyda,Could you please list two pieces of evidence that evolutionists have rejected because they do not fit the evolutionary framework.Please be specific and site your sources.Tell us how they do NOT fit the evolutionary framework and how they DO fit the creationist frameworkPlease give us two things that if found to be true would falsify your religion's creation story. Please make make them testable by anyone. Please list some of the tests that you might perform.

---

Asgara
"Embrace the pain, spank your inner moppet, whatever....but get over it"

Cora, Ned and Frog addressed the Mt St Helen's rocks. http://EvC Forum: Debate - Ongoing controversy, the EvC question
If volcanic action doesn't fully melt the rock that is mixed with the lava, and dating is done on the rocks you are going to get the original age of the rock, not the reset lava.Like Ned said, we have an entire thread devoted to Ernst http://EvC Forum: Why are Haeckel's drawings being taught in school?
The same structures that give rise to the jaw in humans gives rise to gills in other organisms. This is hardly a lie that is being covered up in biology classrooms.The argument concerning Pastuer's experiments doesn't involve abiogenesis. It involves fully formed, modern organisms coming from non-life. His argument was against things like maggots forming FROM rotten meat not coming from fly eggs ON rotten meat.The peppered moth example is a perfect example of frequency of alleles changing in a population over time. Guess what, this is evolution. The change in allele frequency, over time can become speciation. Guess what, this is still evolution.

---

Asgara
"Embrace the pain, spank your inner moppet, whatever....but get over it"