Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,870 Year: 4,127/9,624 Month: 998/974 Week: 325/286 Day: 46/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Debate - Ongoing controversy, the EvC question
MrHambre
Member (Idle past 1421 days)
Posts: 1495
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 17 of 40 (107955)
05-13-2004 1:16 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by almeyda
05-13-2004 12:42 PM


So Falsify
quote:
1. Creation is very falsifiable.
In that case you won't have any problem offering an observation that would falsify the creation hypothesis. Offer a prospective piece of evidence that would falsify the theory of special creation.
I started this thread in order to demonstrate that creationists could not offer potentially disconfirming evidence of 'divine design.' The theory of evolution by natural selection could be falsified in many ways, as I discussed in the linked thread. Creationism, in contrast, is not scientific because (among other things) there is no conceivable evidence that couldn't be answered by saying "God wanted it that way."
regards,
Esteban Hambre

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by almeyda, posted 05-13-2004 12:42 PM almeyda has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 05-17-2004 8:11 PM MrHambre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024